HUTCHISON Amendment (#218) would fund 2,000 border agents.

Thomas ^ | 3-17-05 | Senator HUTCHISON

[OXENinFLA]

Mrs. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

The amendment is as follows: (Purpose: To fully fund the level of Border Patrol Agents authorized by National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004 and as recommended by the 9/11 Commission)

On page 23, line 16, increase the amount by $352,400,000.

On page 23, line 17, increase the amount by $317,000,000.

On page 23, line 21, increase the amount by $35,400,000.

On page 9, line 15, decrease the amount by $352,400,000.

On page 9, line 16, decrease the amount by $317,000,000.

On page 9, line 20, decrease the amount by $35,400,000.

Mrs. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, this is an amendment cosponsored by myself and Senator Ensign. Senator Ensign has done so much work in this area on the intelligence reform bill, assuring there would be 2,000 authorized Border Patrol agents. We also have as cosponsors Senators Domenici, Cornyn, McCain, Kyl, and Feinstein. Mr. President, I would like to be notified at the end of 10 minutes, after which I will yield the rest of the time to the Senator from Nevada.

Earlier this month, FBI Director Mueller told Congress that people from countries with ties to al-Qaida are crossing into the United States through our porous border with Mexico.

Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security James Loy recently said that intelligence reports suggest al-Qaida is considering using the Southwest border to infiltrate into the United States, either with falsified documents or by crossing the border in other illegal ways.

We have today 11,000 Border Patrol agents for the borders between Mexico, the United States, and Canada, as well as in the Border Patrol centers that are throughout our country. It is clearly not enough.

Mr. President, 97 percent of illegal intruders are filtering through the Southwest border. But they do not stay in the South. They go throughout our country.

The Border Patrol does an amazing job. We applaud their work. But we need to give them more help. Recent stories and intelligence reports show that terrorists are planning to use our border, and it should be a wakeup call.

Since 2001, 1,300 agents have been added to the force. But we have 6,900 miles of border with Canada and Mexico. My State of Texas alone has over 1,200 miles of border with Mexico. In most places there are no fences. In Texas, the Rio Grande River can sometimes be waded across or is completely dry.

We are seeing an increase of 137 percent in immigrants who are from countries other than Mexico. These immigrants, which are called OTMs, ``other than Mexicans,'' are coming into our country in the largest numbers we have ever seen. But due to a lack of resources, they are often caught and released, or they are not caught at all.

Recognizing our serious border vulnerability, Congress passed the intelligence reform bill last year and authorized an increase of 10,000 Border Patrol agents over 5 years. It included provisions to add 8,000 detention beds and 800 additional interior investigators. Unfortunately, the budget before us only allocated enough to cover 210 agents, 143 investigators, and 1,920 beds for detention.

The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection recently said:

We do not have enough agents; we don't have enough technology to give us the security we need.

Let me give you some examples of recent happenings.

In Detroit, Mahmoud Youssef Kourani was indicted in the Eastern District of Michigan on one count of conspiracy to provide material support to Hezbollah. Kourani was already in custody for entering the country illegally through Mexico and was involved in fundraising activities on behalf of Hezbollah.

The two groups of Arab males were discovered by patrol guards from Willcox, AZ. One field agent said:

These guys didn't speak Spanish, and they were speaking to each other in Arabic. It's ridiculous that we don't take this more seriously. We're told not to say a thing to the media.

This is a field agent for the Border Patrol.

Last July, in Burlington, VT, police raided an international syndicate that forced Asian women to work as sex slaves. The women told investigators they had been smuggled from Asia to Mexico, entering the United States through Arizona, Texas, and other States. They ended up in Vermont.

Take the example of the capture of terrorist suspect Jose Padilla. The Justice Department says Padilla and an accomplice planned to enter the United States through Mexico to blow up apartment buildings in major cities such as New York.

Or the case of suspected al-Qaida sleeper agent Mohammed Junaid Babar, who told investigators of a scheme to smuggle terrorists across the Mexican border. He is tied to a terror plot to carry out bombings and assassinations in London.

Further stories indicate there are real concerns about terrorists entering our country through the southern border.

Along the Mexican border there have been stories of suspicious items picked up by local residents, including Muslim prayer rugs and notebooks written in both Arabic and Spanish. These items came from OTMs and a subcategory called special interest aliens, who are illegals coming from terrorist-sponsoring countries.

Intelligence reports suggesting that 25 Chechen terrorism suspects have illegally entered the United States from Mexico have refocused attention on a porous border from which many believe the next major attack on Americans could come.

Patrol agents told one Arizona newspaper that 77 males ``of Middle Eastern descent'' were apprehended in June of last year in 2 separate incidents. All were trekking through the mountains and are believed to have been part of a larger group of illegal immigrants. Many were released pending immigration hearings.

Also last July, an Egyptian man United States authorities described as one of their most wanted smugglers of humans was arrested on charges of operating a ring that illegally brought people from Egypt and other Middle Eastern countries to the United States. The indictment says Abdallah and his associates would direct people seeking to reach the

United States to travel to one of several Latin American countries, and from there to Guatemala. They would then be transported to America through Mexico in return for payments of thousands of dollars in smuggling fees.

The amendment we are offering tonight will add $315 million to the President's request for the Border Patrol. This will provide for the training and equipping of 2,000 agents. This would be the full amount authorized and will have a dramatic impact on the security-related problems we have on the border.

In order to maintain a fiscally responsible bill, and not increase the top cap of discretionary spending, we are offsetting this increase with an equal reduction in the international affairs section of the budget because protecting our borders from foreign threats is an international affair.

Today, with my colleagues Senators Ensign, Domenici, Cornyn, McCain, Kyl, and Feinstein, I am calling on Congress to do more than add 210 Border Patrol agents that are in the underlying budget. We are asking for the full contingent authorized of 2,000. This is still not enough. And I hope we will be able to come back next year and get up to the full 2,000 again.

But the warning flag has gone up. We must heed the warnings we have been given. Every incident I mentioned is a call to the United States to make sure that our borders with Mexico are secure. We need more Border Patrol agents and more detention facilities to make our borders secure.

The people of our country deserve this security, and our amendment will take one step in the right direction. I hope my colleagues will work with me to pass this in the budget and then later in the Appropriations bill. We must do everything to heed the warning call we have gotten.

Mr. President, I yield the rest of our time to the Senator from Nevada, who has also worked very hard on this amendment. I appreciate very much his cosponsoring this amendment with me today.

[B4Ranch]

The opposite of "Open Borders" is _________________? You may shun the words "Closed Borders" but you also shun arresting the illegals and returning them to their home country which means IMO that you support their indifference to our the immigration laws.

If you wish to live next to a criminal that is your choice. I think that option should only be available to you in a jail or a prison.

You don't see a problem with their children taking seats in an education facility either. The results of this are that, we the taxpayers, must build more schools to accomodate their children.

The number of accidents on our streets and highways has risen due to illegal aliens, but this is a non issue with you also.

Our prisons hold 30% Hispanics, another non issue in your mind.

I recall an FR poll asking if they should be returned to Mexico in order to qualify for a "Guest Worker Pass". Can you locate it?

Hey Yankee! Kiss My Family Values

[Ajnin]

There are 200,000 armed agents of the FedGov of various species. And 2000 are NOT available to be transferred to Border Patrol?

Anybody transferred to the Border Patrol from another agency would quit.

[Ajnin]

Every BP agent who went to Iraq volunteered to go. No one was "reassigned" but why let facts get in the way of your Bush hatred.

Maybe you should adhere to your own advise.

[Howlin]

The opposite of "Open Borders" is _________________?

Again, you insinuate that if we don't agree with you, we're OPPOSED to closed borders, and that we're for open borders.

You may shun the words "Closed Borders" but you also shun arresting the illegals and returning them to their home country

I'll sit right here where you find ANY post where I said anything close to that.

And none of this "I assume" crap; paste ANY post I've made where I support "shun arresting illegals and returning them to Mexico.

No parsing!

Now put up or you'll be shown to be the fraudulent poster you are.

[Howlin]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1364652/posts?page=84#84

[Mo1]

I don't recall you every saying that

[Howlin]

He made it up.

[COEXERJ145]

Yeah I'd like to see where you, I, or the others who get attacked daily have said we're for "open borders" or we support illegal immigration. Some people just seem to think that if we don't agree with their views 100% than we're for "open borders". Heck, they've even accused JR of being for "open borders" because he doesn't support the MMP.

[Howlin]

What the heck kind of agenda does a person have if they have to lie about it to score points?

[COEXERJ145]

What the heck kind of agenda does a person have if they have to lie about it to score points?

An agenda that they can't backed up otherwise.

[hosepipe]

2000 Guard guards or pencil pusher apparatchiks..?.

[Mo1]

They always do

[B4Ranch]

I am not saying that you said this specifically but if not you then Bayourod, TJ or one of the other people who continue to protest closing of the borders has said it.

All of you are following the same line of thinking which is that you don't want the Minutemen Program to exist or succeed. You certainly do not want anyone arrested for sneaking into the US illegally and heaven forbid that their family should be deported with them also because they are here illegally.

Answer this for me.

Why is it that you find our demand for obediance to the immigration laws of America so horrendous?

That is all we are asking for! American citizens must obey these laws, why do you want to permit illegal aliens to ignore them and not be penalized as you and I would be?

That's where I am lost. Permit a foreigner to ignore the law but demand we obey them. We should all be looking at the same clock here.

[Howlin]

I am not saying that you said this specifically

Oh, but you did.

Still waiting for ANY post of mine that said anything close to that.

[B4Ranch]

Nice avoidance, Darling. Can you show me where there is a "You said" in my posts?

[Howlin]

Can you show me where there is a "You said" in my posts?

Glad to.

You may shun the words "Closed Borders" but you also shun arresting the illegals and returning them to their home country which means IMO that you support their indifference to our the immigration laws.

You stated it as a FACT; now pony up with my post -- and no asssuming or trying to pawn off something somebody else has said to me -- or everybody will see what a phoney you are.

And don't patronize me by calling me "Darling."

[SandRat]

Send 'em we can put them to work RIGHT NOW!

[SandRat]

Ya GOT THAT RIGHT

[Happy2BMe]

I see you have encountered a situation that requires immediate activation of . .

THE THREAT IS REAL(CLICK)

New Homeland Security Warning System

[Happy2BMe]

Do you consider John McCain a viable candidate for the next President?