Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: Nuts and Bolton
The Spectator (U.K.) ^ | 03/19/05 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/17/2005 6:13:21 AM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Clara Lou
He's my hero too. Every time you think "this guy just flat out NAILED that subject! He couldn't top THIS column if he tried!".

Think again....and don't forget to read him tommorrow.

41 posted on 03/17/2005 7:36:00 AM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Steyn must have a team of researchers, writers and philosophers. It is not humanly possible for one man to turn out such brilliance on a daily basis.


42 posted on 03/17/2005 7:43:22 AM PST by usurper (Correct spelling is overrated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Many thanks!
43 posted on 03/17/2005 7:45:13 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

"How does he continue to crank these gems out, day after day?"

Possibly there is an advantage writing about a nation not one's own - DeToqueville and Paul Johnson come to mind.

Whatever the reason, Styn clearly writes with a precision, simplicity, and insight that is unmatched.


44 posted on 03/17/2005 7:47:07 AM PST by GladesGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
...why the international community might be minded to throw its hands up and shriek, ‘Quelle horreur!’

I so love when that happens!

45 posted on 03/17/2005 7:59:58 AM PST by ride the whirlwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
In recent years, for example, I can find only one example of a senior UN figure having the guts to call a member state a ‘totalitarian regime’. It was former secretary-general Boutros Boutros-Ghali last autumn, and he was talking about America. John Bolton’s sin isn’t that he’s ‘undiplomatic’, but that he’s correct.

Steyn Bump!!

46 posted on 03/17/2005 8:00:50 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Martha Stewart to run the Securities and Exchange Commission?

Well, she is certainly more honest and scrupulous than old Joe Kennedy who was made the first head of the SEC by FDR.

SO9

47 posted on 03/17/2005 8:09:16 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Here's an FR thread on it, FWIW.
48 posted on 03/17/2005 8:16:57 AM PST by BJClinton (“Give me your DUmmies, your Idiots, your Leftist Wackos yearning to be sanity free.” ~PJ-Comix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Bump for later read.


49 posted on 03/17/2005 8:24:56 AM PST by Romish_Papist (Hannity nutshell: "Buy my book, eat @ Ruth's Chris Steakhouse, repeat ad nauseum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Great column..BTW, I gather there is NO Mrs. Steyn..


50 posted on 03/17/2005 8:25:31 AM PST by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton
Thank you too.

It's an amazing statement.

51 posted on 03/17/2005 8:25:42 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ken5050; Capriole
BTW, I gather there is NO Mrs. Steyn..
Somebody will be happy to hear this news! ;)
52 posted on 03/17/2005 8:27:50 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; Valin; yonif; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; ...
Mark Steyn:

...That’s what was so stunning about Bolton. In a roomful of Euro-grandees, he was perfectly relaxed, a genial fellow with a rather Mitteleuropean moustache, but he thwacked every ball they served back down their gullets with amazing precision. He was the absolute antithesis of Schmoozer Bill and Pandering Eason: he seemed to relish their hostility. At one event, a startled British cabinet minister said to me afterwards, ‘He doesn’t mean all that, does he?’

But he does. And that’s why the Bolton flap is very revealing about conventional wisdom on transnationalism. Diplomats are supposed to be ‘diplomatic’. Why is that? Well, as the late Canadian prime minister Lester B. Pearson used to say, diplomacy is the art of letting the other fellow have your way. In other words, you were polite, discreet, circumspect, etc., as a means to an end. Not any more. None of John Bolton’s detractors is worried that his bluntness will jeopardise the administration’s policy goals. Quite the contrary. They’re concerned that the administration has policy goals — that it isn’t yet willing to subordinate its national interest to the polite transnational pieties. In that sense, our understanding of ‘diplomacy’ has become corrupted: it’s no longer the language through which nation states treat with one another so much as the code-speak consensus of a global elite.

For much of the civilised world the transnational pabulum has become an end in itself, and one largely unmoored from anything so tiresome as reality. It doesn’t matter whether there is any global warming or, if there is, whether Kyoto will do anything about it or, if you ratify Kyoto, whether you bother to comply with it: all that matters is that you sign on to the transnational articles of faith...


Nailed It!
Moral Clarity BUMP !

This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of good stuff that is worthy attention. I keep separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson, Lee Harris, David Warren, Orson Scott Card. You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about).

53 posted on 03/17/2005 8:31:15 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

No, alas, he occasionally mentions his wife in the course of his writing and has said that she is "mostly apolitical." As I said, he needs to dump her and come to Mama. We can go shooting together.


54 posted on 03/17/2005 8:39:31 AM PST by Capriole (I don't have any problems that couldn't be solved by more chocolate or more ammunition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Blew my mind when I first read it. I thought it was being taken out of context at first. The silence of the MSM on this is typical, after all we do need to know exactly what's going on in the Michael Jackson trial 24/7.


55 posted on 03/17/2005 8:56:50 AM PST by BJClinton (“Give me your DUmmies, your Idiots, your Leftist Wackos yearning to be sanity free.” ~PJ-Comix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Yet the assumption behind much of the criticism of Bolton from the likes of John Kerry is that, regardless of his government’s foreign policy, a UN ambassador has to be at some level a UN booster. Twenty years ago, the then Secretary of State George Schultz used to welcome the Reagan administration’s ambassadorial appointments to his office and invite each chap to identify his country on the map. The guy who’d just landed the embassy in Chad would invariably point to Chad. ‘No,’ Schultz would say, ‘this is your country’ — and point to the United States. Nobody would expect a US ambassador to the Soviet Union to be a big booster for the Soviets. And, given that in a unipolar world the most plausible challenger to the US is transnationalism, these days the Schultz test is even more pertinent for the UN ambassador: his country is the United States, not the ersatz jurisdiction of Kofi Annan’s embryo world government.

Thank you Mark for this account (and thank you Pokey for the ping). I hope and expect Condi is doing something similar.

56 posted on 03/17/2005 8:59:28 AM PST by Tares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

So much pith; so little time! I like this one especially:

"Russia ... [m]idway through its transition from ‘superpower’ to ghost town ... "


57 posted on 03/17/2005 9:39:13 AM PST by GretchenM (Do not attempt removing tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Also in Davos, Bill Clinton endorsed the mullahs: ‘Iran today is, in a sense, the only country where progressive ideas enjoy a vast constituency. It is there that the ideas that I subscribe to are defended by a majority.’

Damn. Clinton said this? Didn't hear a thing on the lamestream press...surprise surprise!

58 posted on 03/17/2005 9:44:27 AM PST by hattend (Liberals! Beware the Perfect Rovian Storm [All Hail the Evil War Monkey King, Chimpus Khan!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
This might be Steyn's best column ever. Bravo!

I say this about everyone of his articles that comes out. He just keeps getting better and better with each one.

59 posted on 03/17/2005 9:54:03 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I fall in love with this man afresh each column! You better believe I BTT! Twenty years ago, the then Secretary of State George Schultz used to welcome the Reagan administration’s ambassadorial appointments to his office and invite each chap to identify his country on the map. The guy who’d just landed the embassy in Chad would invariably point to Chad. ‘No,’ Schultz would say, ‘this is your country’ — and point to the United States.
60 posted on 03/17/2005 9:55:29 AM PST by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson