Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bogolyubski

I can tell by your rote recital of the leftist description of Bush that you probably don't approve of much that Bush does and nothing would change your mind.


60 posted on 03/19/2005 7:40:39 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

No, the recital of the leftist/MSM cant was put there to illustrate a point. Bush is basically a big-government liberal.

While he occaisionally makes a decent move, like nominating Bolton to the UN, some conservative judicial appointments (which he then sabotaged by supporting Arlen Specter to chair the judiciary committee) - his whole MO has been to talk conservative and act liberal. It's a sad state of affairs when the two parties give us a choice of a rabid, treasonous Marxist (John Kerry) and a great-society, open-borders liberal (Bush). While I voted for the man twice, I am very unhappy with the constant flim-flam. The reason Bush signed this outrageous, unconstitutional law is simply that he believes in it. He does not care about the 1st amendment, but in keeping the ruling elite in permanent power. This republic is all but finished. Tyranny is just around the corner.


61 posted on 03/19/2005 9:29:08 AM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson