Skip to comments.
Blake's Hollywood Ending (Cops withheld key evidence)
CBS ^
| 3.16.05
Posted on 03/16/2005 5:33:05 PM PST by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
1
posted on
03/16/2005 5:33:07 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Post trial statement by Blake, "I've gone thru $10m and I need a job!"
Is that fair?
2
posted on
03/16/2005 5:40:00 PM PST
by
Prost1
(New AG, Berger still free!)
To: Prost1
Hey, he got away with murder. That's gotta be worth a few million.
And you can take dat to da bank.
3
posted on
03/16/2005 5:42:44 PM PST
by
Argus
(Mi tagline es su tagline)
To: ambrose; MeekOneGOP
Blake was acquitted, because the trial was held in California. I don't think he'd want to face a Texas jury.
4
posted on
03/16/2005 5:45:07 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(I Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Oh, I think Blake was acquitted because Bakley was so despicable. The more I heard about her, I personally thought someone should give her killer a medal for doing the deed. I suspect Blake might have had something to do with it--hired someone, maybe he shot her himself--but honestly, she was just an awful human being.
5
posted on
03/16/2005 5:48:50 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: ambrose
Bonnie Blakeley was a nut anyhow, but here is the deal. I never thought someone would beat OJ for indifference at a murder trial, but Scott Peterson did it. From his fake crying at the arrainment (he was nearly laughing!!) to his stone face during the entire trial, it was pretty obvious at least to me.
Did Blake get away with murder? Not according to the jury....
6
posted on
03/16/2005 5:51:56 PM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(Silly Hippies, Bush Won!!!!)
To: Paleo Conservative
It sounds like he would have gotten away with it in Texas or any other Southern State. He would have used the Southern Defense: "She needed killin".
7
posted on
03/16/2005 5:54:21 PM PST
by
wolfpat
(Dum vivimus, vivamus)
To: ambrose
Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?
8
posted on
03/16/2005 6:01:00 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
To: Clara Lou
Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?
Yes Clara Lou, I did, I read it with all of the moral superiority I could muster (LOL).
Seriously now, the revelation that the police withheld evidence that would probably have further crumbled the prosecution's case proves that Blake didn't do it. The video tape taken of Blake proves his demeanor in the wake of the shooting, and the fact that IF he had shot his wife, why would he leave her alive to identify him as the killer? The paramedics found her alive, although she died later.
To: Paleo Conservative
Hmmmm? If California is the problem - then how do you account for the Peterson verdict ..??
10
posted on
03/16/2005 6:06:04 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
To: Mad Mammoth
"IF he had shot his wife, why would he leave her alive to identify him as the killer"
The guy he hired to do it wasn't professional enough. Blake placed set his wife in place and made his alibi, going back to the restaurant.
Just a theory...
11
posted on
03/16/2005 6:12:49 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
The guy he hired to do it wasn't professional enough. Blake placed set his wife in place and made his alibi, going back to the restaurant. Just a theory...
Where were you when the prosecution's case was falling apart?!? ;)
To: ambrose
..a defense expert testified that Bakley's shooter should have had more residue on her than was found on Blake's hands when he was tested that night." More residue on her? Does the author know that a woman was the real shooter? Or does the CBS stylebook say to ignore standard English usage in furtherance of "inclusive" language?
13
posted on
03/16/2005 6:16:04 PM PST
by
Luddite Patent Counsel
("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
To: Clara Lou
"Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?"
I did, and that is why I believe him innocent and robbed.
14
posted on
03/16/2005 6:22:07 PM PST
by
Prost1
(New AG, Berger still free!)
To: Mad Mammoth
Where were you when the prosecution's case was falling apart?!? ;)Heh! Arguments like that explain why the prosecution lost the case. Here are a few more 'arguments':
Salvadoran gangs did it;
Blake's former producers did itto frame him to get even for the money they lost;
OJ did it.
Sounds to me like the prosecution could have used all 3 and gotten the same results.
To: ambrose
I never thought Blake did it. This was a good verdict based on a crappy case against him.
16
posted on
03/16/2005 6:24:30 PM PST
by
DaGman
To: Paleo Conservative
Blake was acquitted, because the trial was held in California. I don't think he'd want to face a Texas jury. In Texas the defense would be "The Bi##ch needed killing."
17
posted on
03/16/2005 6:43:16 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
To: CyberAnt
then how do you account for the Peterson verdict ..??The media went for the safest choice. They sided with Her.
18
posted on
03/16/2005 6:47:05 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: ambrose
Blake and OJ can now pool their resources and scour all the golf courses in the country looking for the real killers.
19
posted on
03/16/2005 6:48:23 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: ambrose
If he hadn't had the money to fight this sham trial, he would be sitting on death row by now. They never had evidence he killed her. they DECIDED he did it and went from there. Pathetic.
20
posted on
03/16/2005 7:04:52 PM PST
by
marty60
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson