Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blake's Hollywood Ending (Cops withheld key evidence)
CBS ^ | 3.16.05

Posted on 03/16/2005 5:33:05 PM PST by ambrose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2005 5:33:07 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Post trial statement by Blake, "I've gone thru $10m and I need a job!"

Is that fair?


2 posted on 03/16/2005 5:40:00 PM PST by Prost1 (New AG, Berger still free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

Hey, he got away with murder. That's gotta be worth a few million.

And you can take dat to da bank.


3 posted on 03/16/2005 5:42:44 PM PST by Argus (Mi tagline es su tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; MeekOneGOP

Blake was acquitted, because the trial was held in California. I don't think he'd want to face a Texas jury.


4 posted on 03/16/2005 5:45:07 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (I Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Oh, I think Blake was acquitted because Bakley was so despicable. The more I heard about her, I personally thought someone should give her killer a medal for doing the deed. I suspect Blake might have had something to do with it--hired someone, maybe he shot her himself--but honestly, she was just an awful human being.


5 posted on 03/16/2005 5:48:50 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Bonnie Blakeley was a nut anyhow, but here is the deal. I never thought someone would beat OJ for indifference at a murder trial, but Scott Peterson did it. From his fake crying at the arrainment (he was nearly laughing!!) to his stone face during the entire trial, it was pretty obvious at least to me.

Did Blake get away with murder? Not according to the jury....


6 posted on 03/16/2005 5:51:56 PM PST by MikefromOhio (Silly Hippies, Bush Won!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
It sounds like he would have gotten away with it in Texas or any other Southern State. He would have used the Southern Defense: "She needed killin".
7 posted on 03/16/2005 5:54:21 PM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?


8 posted on 03/16/2005 6:01:00 PM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?

Yes Clara Lou, I did, I read it with all of the moral superiority I could muster (LOL).

Seriously now, the revelation that the police withheld evidence that would probably have further crumbled the prosecution's case proves that Blake didn't do it. The video tape taken of Blake proves his demeanor in the wake of the shooting, and the fact that IF he had shot his wife, why would he leave her alive to identify him as the killer? The paramedics found her alive, although she died later.
9 posted on 03/16/2005 6:05:46 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Hmmmm? If California is the problem - then how do you account for the Peterson verdict ..??


10 posted on 03/16/2005 6:06:04 PM PST by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

"IF he had shot his wife, why would he leave her alive to identify him as the killer"

The guy he hired to do it wasn't professional enough. Blake placed set his wife in place and made his alibi, going back to the restaurant.

Just a theory...


11 posted on 03/16/2005 6:12:49 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
The guy he hired to do it wasn't professional enough. Blake placed set his wife in place and made his alibi, going back to the restaurant. Just a theory...

Where were you when the prosecution's case was falling apart?!? ;)
12 posted on 03/16/2005 6:15:45 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
..a defense expert testified that Bakley's shooter should have had more residue on her than was found on Blake's hands when he was tested that night."

More residue on her? Does the author know that a woman was the real shooter? Or does the CBS stylebook say to ignore standard English usage in furtherance of "inclusive" language?

13 posted on 03/16/2005 6:16:04 PM PST by Luddite Patent Counsel ("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

"Did anybody on this thread actually read the article?"

I did, and that is why I believe him innocent and robbed.


14 posted on 03/16/2005 6:22:07 PM PST by Prost1 (New AG, Berger still free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
Where were you when the prosecution's case was falling apart?!? ;)

Heh! Arguments like that explain why the prosecution lost the case. Here are a few more 'arguments':

Salvadoran gangs did it;

Blake's former producers did itto frame him to get even for the money they lost;

OJ did it.

Sounds to me like the prosecution could have used all 3 and gotten the same results.

15 posted on 03/16/2005 6:23:36 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I never thought Blake did it. This was a good verdict based on a crappy case against him.


16 posted on 03/16/2005 6:24:30 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Blake was acquitted, because the trial was held in California. I don't think he'd want to face a Texas jury.

In Texas the defense would be "The Bi##ch needed killing."

17 posted on 03/16/2005 6:43:16 PM PST by itsahoot (There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
then how do you account for the Peterson verdict ..??

The media went for the safest choice. They sided with Her.

18 posted on 03/16/2005 6:47:05 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Blake and OJ can now pool their resources and scour all the golf courses in the country looking for the real killers.


19 posted on 03/16/2005 6:48:23 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

If he hadn't had the money to fight this sham trial, he would be sitting on death row by now. They never had evidence he killed her. they DECIDED he did it and went from there. Pathetic.


20 posted on 03/16/2005 7:04:52 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson