Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny
Good points. But regardless of where everyone stands on the Blake case, I think we can all agree that his dead wife was an abominable person, she ran countless scams by sending out naked pictures of herself to lonely men who foolishly responded by sending her money, she was totally fixated on 'going Hollywood' if not by her own talents, by latching on to some Hollywood icon, either from the past, present or future. It isn't up to anyone to say whether or not she 'deserved' to die, but can anyone deny that considering her amoral lifestyle, selling sex via the U.S. Mail, one con game after another, that she didn't reap what she sowed? There are instances where cosmic karma seems to kick in, and I think this is one of them. Did Blake want her dead? Probably. Did he do it or arrange for it to be done?

The jury said "no evidence", and they acquitted him. If perchance he DID do it, he'll ultimately face God as we ALL will one day.

Everyone has been on edge in this thread, I'm no exception. I apologize to any and all if my words have been too harsh. We're all FReepers. Thank God we're in a Country where we can associate this way without fear and with total freedom to express our opinions.

Rant mode off.

Regards,

MM
743 posted on 03/16/2005 5:39:55 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Mammoth

We will send you a censorship ticket to your address where you live.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha . . . . . someday that may be true?

I am glad he was found NOT GUILTY. Maybe now the MSNM will keep their damn noses out of everyone's business. Do we really need to hear everyday for more than a year Blake's trial? Come on! Enough is enough!


750 posted on 03/16/2005 5:55:46 PM PST by standing united (The second amendment does not stand for the right to hunt, but to over throw a corrupt Gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Mammoth

Fair synopsis, it seems.

I didn't follow the case all that closely, but I do recall that the evidence seemed pretty light. Apparently the jury thought so too.

Like it or not, that *is* justice. In order to be found guilty of a crime there has to be a jury of ones peers that thinks there is enough evidence to put you away. Its this system that protects all of us.

Sometimes people get away with crimes. Justice, sometimes, will demand that this happen in order to make it harder to put away innocent people. That's part of the price of justice.

Be that as it may... I just can't find in myself any outrage over this one. I honestly don't have a strong opinion over whether he really did it or not. He's the most likely suspect, but it seems that this woman had plenty of likely suspects in her life. The bottom line remains that there wasn't enough evidence to convince the jury. So be it.


754 posted on 03/16/2005 6:06:39 PM PST by Ramius (Hmmm... yeah, that'd be great...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson