All sides agree (including the parents) that the court must determine what Terri's wishes would be. Statements made by Terri to others are not hearsay. They are offered for the fact that she made them. You misapprehend the hearsay rule.
By the way, courts don't 'advocate', lawyers advocate. Courts decide.
This is simply a lie. The state has NO power to order an American citizen starved to death. Show me in the US Constitution or Florida Constitution where that power resides. You can't do it because it doesn't exist It is thoroughly UNCONSTITUIONAL.
Statements made by Terri to others are not hearsay. They are offered for the fact that she made them. You misapprehend the hearsay rule.
OK, you got me. I withdraw "hearsay" and substitute BS.
By the way, courts don't 'advocate', lawyers advocate. Courts decide.
LOL, I meant exactly what I said, Greer and the Superior Courts are advocating for her death, just like you are.
BTW, I understand your reticence to answer any question I pose because you don't have any answers. Like Greer, you prejudged the case of Terri Schiavo and you are now stuck on the side supporting the power of a state to dehydrate human beings to death.