[eccentric]

I believe the general rule of the husband acting for the wife when she cannot, is a good one absent sufficient evidence to overturn it.

Could it be that 'sufficient evidence' doesn't exist because the 'less than honorable' judge dismissed the sheriff's report and then it was lost in an office where Michael's mistress's mother works?

[winstonchurchill]

Could it be that 'sufficient evidence' doesn't exist because the 'less than honorable' judge dismissed the sheriff's report and then it was lost in an office where Michael's mistress's mother works?

Is the sheriff's report the 1991 nuclear imaging report or something different?

What is the evidence behind the charge that the judge was "less than honorable"?