To: bjs1779
You post a long affidavit, designed to support the position that Terry's husband is not a very nice individual and may not have her best interests at heart. The former is not terribly relevant, the latter is greatly so. BUT, it is my understanding that this is precisely what has now been litigated up and down the Florida legal system for years now. The ultimate determination of the civil authorities seems to be that (i) her husband is the proper person (a very Scriptural concept by the way) and (ii) it has not been shown to the satisfaction of the court that his various actions (and proposed actions) are not consistent with her best interests.
As a Biblical Christian, I am enjoined to respect that decision. As a human being, I also think it a wise one.
To: winstonchurchill
You post a long affidavit, designed to support the position that Terry's husband is not a very nice individual and may not have her best interests at heart. Do you have something against a long affidavit by someone who has nothing to gain by telling the truth? Terri is been in solitary confinement for some 13 years now. Surly the lenght of that post pales in comparison. My apolgies if you think otherwise.
527 posted on
03/16/2005 5:32:58 PM PST by
bjs1779
(" It is unlikely that Terri currently needs the feeding tube." Examination by Dr. Hammesfahr 9/12/02)
To: winstonchurchill
Scriptural?? Adultery? Illegitimate children?
Refusing medical treatment, denying visits to family and friends, disallowing trips outside and music and pictures?
Killing her cats? Stealing her wedding ring?
That is NOT scriptural. The husband is supposed to love his wife MORE than himself.
551 posted on
03/16/2005 5:55:01 PM PST by
Politicalmom
(Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson