Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baby dies after judge allows hospital to remove breathing tube.
Houston Chronicle ^ | Mar. 16, 2005 | Leigh Hopper

Posted on 03/16/2005 6:12:01 AM PST by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: Crackingham
So if it's OK to remove someone's only form of life support (i.e. a respirator) against their wishes, then someone please tell me why Christopher Reeve was allowed to live as long as he did?
41 posted on 03/16/2005 6:52:26 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I don't have any questions, but I do have a statement: you don't have all the facts.


42 posted on 03/16/2005 6:52:38 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
May God comfort this baby in his loving arms and then help our sad and lost world.

Muleteam1

43 posted on 03/16/2005 6:53:03 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaoPian

I smell a TROLL.


44 posted on 03/16/2005 6:53:44 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

The baby was not really a baby. This was not life in any way you could define it.


45 posted on 03/16/2005 6:53:53 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: elli1; hellinahandcart

Thanks for the link.

What a heartwrenching situation. Sounds like it was not totally open-and-shut; sounds like the mother's a whack-job — but when it comes to one's children in a situation like this, I'm not inclined to be too harsh.

One of the very most terrified moments in my life was when we had to rush my then-baby to a hospital via ambulance, as he was choking and coughing up blood. I likely lost a decade in that first hour or two. (Thank GOD it turned out okay.)

Dan


46 posted on 03/16/2005 6:53:57 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

BTW, it was about money in a sense; she gets a check as long as the baby is in the hospital.

To buy her drugs.


47 posted on 03/16/2005 6:55:02 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DaoPian

"The resources required to keep this baby alive could have kept hundreds alive somewhere else. Choices are always tough when it comes to these issues. We live in a world of limited resources and rationing is a fact of life."

So now we play god and ration life away?

SICK!



48 posted on 03/16/2005 6:55:27 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
This link is to a picture in today's Chronicle. The baby's head appears to be a normal size. His body [not visible in this pictue] is undersized--short and very narrow through the chest. As you can see from the picture his arms are disproportionately short. He is also not awake as he is in his mother's arms.
49 posted on 03/16/2005 6:55:40 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; All

Just for the sake of discussion, why don't we define "life".


50 posted on 03/16/2005 6:55:42 AM PST by DaoPian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Whether or not the child should have been allowed to die--and there are thoughtful people of goodwill on both sides of the issue--that post is completely false.

This was a baby. Very much alive. As human as you or I.


51 posted on 03/16/2005 6:56:45 AM PST by Skooz (Overtaxed host organism for the parasitical State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DaoPian

Life means that at some point in your "life" you would be able to function on SOME level without a machine doing everything for you.

That was not the case in this situation.


52 posted on 03/16/2005 6:57:01 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Well to define the life as such is too broad for my tastes, but I see your point.

I wonder if they harvested the heart or eyes, etc..?

In the event the health care was not paid up-to-date, I wonder if the hospital had forms for the mother to approve that allowed the baby...er, life as you describe, to serve as a donor?

Or, with the defective organs (lungs, etc) did that make him ineligible?

53 posted on 03/16/2005 6:58:13 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

No it wasn't; it wasn't EVER going to function as a even near normal person.


54 posted on 03/16/2005 6:59:10 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
......she gets a check as long as the baby is in the hospital.

From where?

55 posted on 03/16/2005 6:59:32 AM PST by Skooz (Overtaxed host organism for the parasitical State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
What an idiotic assumption! Hospitals are so regulated these days, by internal and external quality control and bioethics bodies, that what you state is virtually impossible.

You sound like a lib....ready to demonize the "evil corporation" without the benefit of the facts. Militant
56 posted on 03/16/2005 6:59:47 AM PST by militant2 ("In conservatism is the salvation of the nation!" RPaul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, HE was. He was a human being by every plausible definition.


57 posted on 03/16/2005 7:00:07 AM PST by Skooz (Overtaxed host organism for the parasitical State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Sun's death marks the first time a U.S. judge has allowed a hospital to discontinue an infant's life-sustaining care against a parent's wishes, according to bioethical experts. A similar case involving a 68-year-old man in a vegetative state at another Houston hospital is before a court now.

And so it begins, judges are now officially gods having the power of life and death, over the innocent. Looks like Hitler won the morality war after all.

58 posted on 03/16/2005 7:00:33 AM PST by itsahoot (There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: militant2
Me? A lib?

Get lost "newbie".

59 posted on 03/16/2005 7:00:48 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

I wouldn't imagine they could have; all his organs were way too small -- I think I read some type of dwarfism is involved -- to support a growing, thriving body; if I recall correctly, that was the problem: the organs were so small that eventually the baby would have "smothered" in a sense.

Most children born with this problem die shortly after birth or in utero.


60 posted on 03/16/2005 7:00:59 AM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson