Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rubber_Duckie_27
"I can understand getting a prenup or postnup. It's like fire insurance...you hope to never need it, but it's there if you do"

- A male who marries in 2005 and doesn't insist on an iron clad, court room tested prenup has rocks in his head. It should be a standard pre marriage document, much like the requirement for a marriage license. Unfortunately many women still resist signing, using the old, "If you really loved me you wouldn't ask me to agree to such a thing" defense. Bull.
With court rulings, the term "marriage" has pretty well lost it's traditional meaning and soon it's association with religion will be a quaint historical footnote, unknown to all but a few.
If you want a foretaste of what the different forms of marriage will do to the children of such loose associations in the future, just look at the screwed up lives of the offspring of Hollywood "stars".
Now imagine an entire country full of such cripples. The social costs are going to be horrific.
26 posted on 03/16/2005 4:35:47 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: finnigan2

The "social costs" are already here, and have been for a while.


133 posted on 03/16/2005 11:50:52 AM PST by dg62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson