Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Engaged Men Are Setting Up Divorce Nest Eggs
The Hoosier Gazette ^ | March 16, 2005 | August Wayne

Posted on 03/16/2005 3:28:28 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: Protagoras

Happened to a friend of mine. When his grandfather died who himself was very wealthy, quite a few family heirlooms were earmarked to his grandchildren. Their grandmother died and he remarried but didn't do a prenup. After the grandfater died, the step-grandmother told his grandchildren that if they wanted the heilooms, they would have to buy them off of her. She also filed a lawsuit to get the grandfather's will thrown out of court since he earmarked the money in a trust for his kid/grandkids. She lost but it cost a lot of the kids inheritance. What a b*tch.

Again, I will do a prenup if I get married again. It is my assets and I will not put up with a black robe dictating how it is distributed in divorce based on his reason of "protecting Society's view".

>>If you are thinking about divorce before you get married, >>then you probably shouldn't get married.
>
>Usually true.
>
>A different scenerio however can occur. Try this one;
>A man and woman meet young, marry, have a wonderful life >together, and raise a few nice children. They are >financially sucessful as well. One dies. A few years pass, >and the person meets and contemplates marriage again to a >new person.
>
>Some people are so good at hiding their real intentions >that it makes perfect sense to figure out a way to start >fresh, segregating all their assets so they can be left to >the children instead of someone else who had nothing >whatsoever to do with earning the assets.
>
>If there was a 1% chance of anything going wrong, and there >always is, it would be stupid to not make sound logical >plans.
>
>I would not contemplate being wed again if the terrible >scenerio took place, but I have no ill feelings for those >who do.


101 posted on 03/16/2005 8:21:00 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Plus, if you use funds from the pre-marriage accounts for major purchases, it is easy to show that the property was acquired with non-marital funds, and the property itself is non-marital nor subject to equitable division in a divorce.

You are very very wrong. If you are going to hold out separate property, it MUST remain separate and never be used in the marriage. Once you use it to pay for something consumed in the marriage, it is community property.

Separate property is a very real concern where something like inheritance for children of a prior marriage, or if there is co-ownership of property with a third party who could be adversely affected if the property were to transfer to the spouse in the event of a death or divorce. Pre nuptuals and will and estate planning is the way to handle those situations. But if you are protecting separate property, it should both be known by the spouse, the rationale understood, and the principle and all income from the account must never enter the marriage spending. It's either separate, or it's not.

102 posted on 03/16/2005 8:30:12 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The divorce rate is approaching 50%, with most divorces initiated by women.

I would question whether the assumption that because someone initiated the divorce would mean that they are '(ir)responsible' for the divorce. Could be just a terrible situation that needs to end.

Full disclosure... my BF is divorced. She initiated. He played a role - perhaps 10%... She's as mean as sin, so things have been very tough for him. Is he getting 'screwed' financially? Yes, but he believes in living up to his obligations towards his kids. And one day, his kids will definitely want to get away from her. Her 'angry' voice (the only one I have ever heard) physically upsets me.

103 posted on 03/16/2005 8:37:58 AM PST by technochick99 (Self defense is a basic human right ; Sig Sauer is my equalizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck
Thank you CORedneck now let me ask this question what if the parents seeing that their child's marriage is in serious trouble set up the trust fund and the child does this change things? does anyone know where I can get information on this? thanks again CORedneck
104 posted on 03/16/2005 8:40:01 AM PST by Texas Patriot (Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

Many times the woman is the one to file... whether she wanted the divorce or not, because that's the only way it actually gets done. Guys are happy the minute they move out... getting the paperwork done sometimes doesn't seem so vital.


105 posted on 03/16/2005 8:40:52 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: shekkian
Are you kidding? Pre-nups are about money. "Honey, I love you and want to spend my life with you. I just don't trust you, so I'm going to keep this account away from you so you can't touch it."

I recall we all laughed at the Mrs. Heinz kept her money out of Mr. Kerry's hands...

106 posted on 03/16/2005 8:41:14 AM PST by technochick99 (Self defense is a basic human right ; Sig Sauer is my equalizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: chris1
The problem is that women know the system is rigged going into it. The worst part is that many women make just as much as guys yet still want to play the oh woe is me game, much to their own success in the face of idiot judges.

The system is not rigged for women, it's rigged for whoever will have the kids.

107 posted on 03/16/2005 8:44:03 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

No accounts are secret from taxes, or secret from the laws of wills and estates. If you've hidden a pile of money with a relative, someone is paying income tax on any income from it. Gift tax and/or income tax was due on it when you "gave" it to the relative, and income and gift taxes, perhaps even estate taxes (gee I hope this secret money was specifically accounted for in the will!) will be due on it if and when it is "given" back to you.

My what a tangled web we weave.....


108 posted on 03/16/2005 8:48:56 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rubber_Duckie_27
"I cannot imagine being so cynical about marriage and about my future spouse that I'd do something like this! I'm getting married next month and if I discovered my husband did something like this I'd be livid."

Let me help you imagine it...

First you "fall" in love and get married to a beautiful girl. After 14 years and two children...there is a divorce.

The court awards the ex-wife the house, spousal support and child support. You end up paying over half a million over about 16 years.

Next you "fall" in love with a beautiful girl...what do you do now?

109 posted on 03/16/2005 8:52:01 AM PST by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justanotherfreeper
The failure of my marriage was sad, they acted like I'd feel so much better if a made myself bitter besides!

I don't understand that attitude at all. The desire for revenge in our society is strong. I think it's much healthier emotionally and spiritually to put it behind you and get on with your life.

I'm sorry for your heartbreak. I know how devistating that can be.

110 posted on 03/16/2005 9:01:49 AM PST by Misty Memory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Rubber_Duckie_27
What's so bad about expecting to be the one with a "long, sound marriage"?

It's a nice dream, but I've seen too many men come home from the sweatshop where he earns what supports the family only to find a restraining order that locks him out of his own house while his dear little wifey sells, hocks, or otherwise trashes all his personal belongings before she takes the house, cars, kids, bank accounts and most of what he will make for the rest of his life.

I know it breaks the spirit of marriage to have a fallback, but so does the feminist-inspired attitude of modern American women.

111 posted on 03/16/2005 9:04:31 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Positive
First off, in the first divorce, she gets half the assets, not all of them. If she lives in the house, she's going to have to buy out your half, or vice-verse.

And in the second marriage, according to you he has nothing.... what's he got to lose?

112 posted on 03/16/2005 9:04:41 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Of the three divorce situations I know about currently, all three are being initiated by the wives. All have teenage kids.

One of the husbands deserves it - he's always out drinking with his buddies, and his wife just started a business & is now doing OK financially.

One couple has a significant age disparity, the early forty something wife is still "fond" of her husband but because she has so much energy thinks it would be "better for him" if they break up.

The last one involves my buddy of 35 years. Married twenty years, his wife apparently finally got so fed up with the BBQ on saturday, church on sunday lifestyle she lost fifty pounds and in rapid succession has taken several boyfriends. Not before officially separating, of course. Although she still lives in the house with her husband.

I can't figger these people out. These women don't charge their husbands with abuse or infidelity - all three claim they're simply bored.

113 posted on 03/16/2005 9:15:47 AM PST by skeeter ("What's to talk about? It's illegal." S Bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

It's not all one sided. Sometimes the woman is evil, sometimes the man.

I knew someone whose husband claimed he had lost everything gambling. They had to move out of their million dollar house and move in with relatives. Husband expected his wife to divorce him. She doesn't. Instead she goes to Gambler's Anonymous to help him with his problem. Finally the real story comes out after a year. He had given all their money to a girlfriend to hold and had been hoping the wife would start divorce proceedings and there would be no money for her to get. Girlfriend turns around and runs off with the money!


114 posted on 03/16/2005 9:16:07 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

My take on the subject is that if you feel like you have to hide things from someone because you fear they may someday take it from you, then you probably shouldn't be getting married to them.

But then, I have never been married, so what do I know.


115 posted on 03/16/2005 9:20:18 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
And I just heard from a woman who found out that her husband had a girlfriend on the side for 8 months, or possibly more. She is devastated. She filed for divorce.

Now, to hear him tell it, they weren't getting along and decided to split. Well, that's one way of putting it. However, when people talk to her, they hear the truth. This has him calling her every few weeks, enraged. It's such a sad situation, I truly feel bad for her.

Since we never really know what goes on behind closed doors, the 'bored' comments may just be polite social talk for 'none of your business'. Or, it could be a lie being told by someone, or even just a short-hand catch-all statement.

116 posted on 03/16/2005 9:21:34 AM PST by technochick99 (Self defense is a basic human right ; Sig Sauer is my equalizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
"Instead she goes to Gambler's Anonymous to help him with his problem."

Sometimes I think there's some truth to the idea that no good deed goes unpunished. Not that that ought to stop anyone from doing what's right, just sad when things don't go like I think they should.

117 posted on 03/16/2005 9:24:50 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Good advice about marriage..

I'd never set up a divorce fund, but I do have 'Papa's Emergency fund".

I never say how much is there, just that it is, and warn everyone in the family if it is getting low.

It is available for emergencies and unforseen expenses, but is one way I can be sure to have some or all of what is needed in advance when something goes wrong. (With 12 grandchildren, something will.)

It never hurts to rathole a little cash, either. (And yes, my wife knows about it, and has "Grandma's" fund, too!)

118 posted on 03/16/2005 9:25:13 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (I work with computers too much to let one run my car!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Makes perfect sen$e....


119 posted on 03/16/2005 9:26:56 AM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
""A man and woman meet young, marry, have a wonderful life together, and raise a few nice children. They are financially sucessful as well. One dies. A few years pass, and the person meets and contemplates marriage again to a new person.""

That situation is different. You have children involved.
120 posted on 03/16/2005 11:22:29 AM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson