Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I’d love to hear any arguments for why mathematics should not be given a higher seat in our body of knowledge than science!

I guess the real question still centers about the nature of the "unreasonable effectiveness of math." Yes, math does seem to describe things unusually well.

But is that because math is in some sense intrinsically descriptive of the universe? Or is it the more like "Junkyard Wars" teams hunting around in a junk-pile for likely-looking parts? (I.e., I have an idea, and here's somebody's esoteric math thing that looks handy in describing it?)

I guess another way of putting it is: is math invented, or is it discovered?

71 posted on 03/17/2005 11:43:42 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
I guess another way of putting it is: is math invented, or is it discovered?

I used to ask my math professors that exact same question. The answers were quite interesting.

74 posted on 03/17/2005 11:52:41 AM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
Thank you so very much for your excellent post, r9etb!

I guess another way of putting it is: is math invented, or is it discovered?

So very true.

The "unreasonable effectiveness of math" is most evident in physics - dualities, mirror symmetries - and my personal favorite, Einstein's being able to pull Reimannian geometry "off the shelf" to describe relativity. For me, it is breath-taking.

81 posted on 03/17/2005 9:31:19 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson