[MacDorcha]

So do you agree or disagree with the author?

Whether or not we support the article is secondary to your support of this person's assertions that you brought forth.

If you support him, and laugh at us for supporting this article, then you miss the purpose of the article.

If you do not support him, but we do, what do you care about his professions in his field? It may be laughable to you for us to support him, but why use his crude and wrong analogies to denounce us?

Either we tout this article and you laugh that we agree with one of your mentors on something or;

We tout this article and you cite the man's contrary (yet bad) work to convince us that he's wrong.

[StJacques]

"So do you agree or disagree with the author?"

The author at Creation-Evolution Headlines?

Absolutely not! He has completely misunderstood Doyle, Kurata, and the other authors whose work he discusses.

And though I have not found extensive excerpts on the web to illuminate the full take Doyle, Csete, Kurata, et al. have on design, evolution, and more; it appears that I will have some common body of agreement with them because their viewpoints do not point to Intelligent Design in any way. Quite the opposite, they point directly away from it as the quotes I referenced make clear.