So far, my initial ping list will be: PatrickHenry; atlaw; js1138; betty boop; cornelis; marron; LogicWings; r9etb; Ronzo; RightWhale; OhioAttorney; ckilmer; xzins; Hank Kerchief
These are correspondents who have recently posted on or near the subject of the investigation (as best I can recall off the top of my head).
I also added Hank Kerchief who has a philosophy ping list, but I don't know if he'll be interested in this subject. I added xzins because he also has a "list" albeit perhaps informal of correspondents interested in the theological ramifications of such things.
Hank and xzins, to get an idea what the fuss is all about you might want to read forward from post 1085.
The science ping list for which you are now famous surely includes people who are exhausted from years of contention and may find some relief in seeing perhaps why it has been this way.
This would make an interesting personality test. List all the kinds of knowing and have people rank them. I don't know what it would prove, but I bet it would predict chat room compatibility.