[speekinout]

No, she said she was "mildly" pro-choice. She said she was against late term abortions and for parental notification.
She also said that she didn't think that most Americans wanted to outlaw abortion in every case.

I think her opinion is exactly where most Americans are, and even if she lost the vote of the one-issue voters, she'd win by a landslide.

One issue voters rarely win.

[advance_copy]

If banning all abortion should not be a federal issue, then why should banning late-term abortion? Why do you think the federal government should have purview over parental notification? Condoleezza Rice is a pro-abort trying to deceive pro-life Republicans, that's why. The word "mildy" does no more to change "pro-choice", which is pro-abortion, than does "evangelical".

San Francisco Chronicle July 1, 1999:

"By her own description, she is pro-choice, or more completely, a 'pro-choice evangelical.'"

Pro-life voters will not vote for Condoleezza Rice. Rice would lose to sHillary were she to win the nomination, which she will not.

[TaxRelief]

I think her opinion is exactly where most Americans are

Actually, poll after poll indicates that "most Americans" oppose abortion. As a matter of fact, the opposition to abortion can be as high as 75% depending on the phrasing of the questions.

Polling Report: Abortion