[GVnana]

"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," Kramer wrote.

Nothing except a law passed by 2/3 of California voters.

[hondo1951]

here in massachusetts, the gays circumvented the electoral process by equating their plite with the civil rights amendment of 1964. The obvious choice was to use the court system because the people shouldn't be allowed to vote on "human rights issues"

[hondo1951]

here in massachusetts, the gays circumvented the electoral process by equating their plite with the civil rights amendment of 1964. The obvious choice was to use the court system because the people shouldn't be allowed to vote on "human rights issues"