Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GVgirl

I think the argument lies in the pursuit of happiness and anyone being allowed to marry anyone they want (i.e., equal rights) so long as the other person is deemed to be able to consent. (THus leaving out age, animals, etc. There are some other stipulations as to number of people involved and familial relations. They're interesting and I'll go into them at some point if you care to find out from me.)


394 posted on 03/15/2005 5:57:13 AM PST by Rambler7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]


To: Rambler7
The problem with that argument is that it makes marriage a condition for "happiness" -- which it's not. (All jokes aside.)

There is nothing in the universe which makes human beings preordained for marriage. It is a contract, a covenant if you will, which is by tradition and intent reserved as an agreement between and man and a woman.

Personally, I don't care who you live with. And any person in this country has the same rights to property, personal safety and liberty as any other.

I don't see that altering the meaning and purpose of marriage serves a greater good.

398 posted on 03/15/2005 6:18:59 AM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson