Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

It is convenient that that trolls and MSM homo-adocates forget that UTAH was admitted on the condition they adopt one man one woman marriage. It was the FEDERAL legislature setting the standard.

I wonder what other recreational behavior is going to recieve such enhanced protection as homosexuals are demanding.


354 posted on 03/14/2005 7:51:59 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

You can tell folks that until you're blue in the face and they will just slough it off Longterm. It's pretty frustrating to keep arguing the same irrefutable points. They just don't care about the facts, the law, the Constitution or the notion of rule by the people.


357 posted on 03/14/2005 7:55:00 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory
It is convenient that that trolls and MSM homo-adocates forget that UTAH was admitted on the condition they adopt one man one woman marriage. It was the FEDERAL legislature setting the standard.

I wonder what other recreational behavior is going to recieve such enhanced protection as homosexuals are demanding.

You hit the nail on the head. What the judge has done is set aside the law restricting marriage to certain individuals. It opens a huge can of worms.

If there can be no laws limiting marriage to one man and one woman, there can be no laws banning polygamy, or banning marriage between individuals with close bloodlines.

378 posted on 03/14/2005 9:53:27 PM PST by magellan ( by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson