QUOTE:
Well, it does seem unconstitutional. I mean, isn't that why some think there would have to be a constitutional amendment against it for it to remain illegal?
The amendment is to make it clear to activist judges who tend to interpret the law according to their present mood that it is indeed unconstitutional.
ENDQUOTE
OK, I'LL BITE. EXPLAIN TO ME (AND TO A WHOLE LOTTA JUDGES IN A WHOLE LOTTA PLACES, SEEMS) HOW IT IS PRESENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Well, it does seem unconstitutional. I mean, isn't that why some think there would have to be a constitutional amendment against it for it to remain illegal?
The amendment is to make it clear to activist judges who tend to interpret the law according to their present mood that it is indeed unconstitutional.
ENDQUOTE
OK, I'LL BITE. EXPLAIN TO ME (AND TO A WHOLE LOTTA JUDGES IN A WHOLE LOTTA PLACES, SEEMS) HOW IT IS PRESENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Oops. Looks like a posted a little too quickly and got a little sloppy. The first two sentences is a quote from you, post 81. This is what I was replying to. In the third sentence, I meant to say 'constitutional', not 'unconstitutional'.