Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nyg4168

Actually DaveyB was correct in a sense. The amendment was first tossed by a state trial judge, later affirmed by the Col. S. Ct. and ultimately affirmed by the USSC.


125 posted on 03/14/2005 1:48:39 PM PST by drungus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: drungus
...and ultimately affirmed by the USSC.

As I recall,(going by memory only) the SCOTUS refused to hear the case - so they did not affirm, but in effect allowed the lower court ruling to stand.

Of importance here is a state judge sworn to uphold the State Constitution ruled against the state Constitution. O'conner has ruled against the Federal Constitution, which she swore to uphold, and instead ruled according to "state interest".

The rule of law no longer applies - we are under the rule of the courts and no one is safe from this horrible plague that will destroy this land.

Gays are not the cause of the problem, they are the curse promised when we forsake the ways of righteousness.

205 posted on 03/14/2005 3:35:01 PM PST by DaveyB (Professing to become wise they became fools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson