Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book: Nazis tested crude nuclear device
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 3/14/05 | Tony Czuczka - AP

Posted on 03/14/2005 8:55:54 AM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: nuke rocketeer

The Japanese were a more dangerous enemy than people living today can even imagine. If they had caught our aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbour in 1941 we would all be speaking Japanese and German today.


21 posted on 03/14/2005 9:19:46 AM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

The Germans had no U235. They needed a reactor (pile) and due to a slight error thought graphite would not work; they were going to use a heavy water reactor (Deuterium).

The Allies blew up the German's only source of D2O, a Norwegian plant, then sank a passenger ferry carrying the last bits of D2O to Germany.

They had no isotope separation plant and only one cyclotron for cross-section work.

The Japanese had no nuclear program except for one or two people, and no equipment for serious isotope work.


22 posted on 03/14/2005 9:19:58 AM PST by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

As I recall that program, there was not enough U-235 to build a gadget and worse still, the Germans had been telling the Japanese about Heisenberg's estimates of critical mass, which were grossly overestimated. The Japanese knew a device could be built, but did not have the final numbers (so to speak) to build one (nor, it seems, enough fuel for the core).


That's my recollection of that somewhat overwrought History Channel production. I stand ready to be corrected.


23 posted on 03/14/2005 9:22:03 AM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
The isotopes would still be there and easily detected ever after all these years, even it were a "dirty bomb" or a true nuke.

I agree. This is just another, the Germans are Uber-smart, article.

24 posted on 03/14/2005 9:22:25 AM PST by elbucko (A Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If they had caught our aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbour in 1941 we would all be speaking Japanese and German today.

I hope you're being sarcastic.

25 posted on 03/14/2005 9:23:00 AM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

It was heavy water that was on the sub, not 235. I think I remember now.


26 posted on 03/14/2005 9:25:12 AM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

The History Channel claimed that they did. U.S. Naval personnel refused to off-load the U-235 from that captured Nazi submarine. They forced the Nazis to do the work themselves because the radiation levels scared them to death. HC showed films of the sub after it was captured. All these films, photos of Japanese planes, captured designs, and information was classified higher that Top Secret until recently. Go to the History Channel web site and do some digging.


27 posted on 03/14/2005 9:25:59 AM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Actually, Japan had their own version of the ME 262 except it was even worse.

And I read an interview with Dr Werner Von Braun about american attacks on Peenumunde during the war as well as other information. The Germans were thought to be far down the path to a nuclear bomb, but they turned out to be on the wrong path. Given a few more years, they may have been able to change direction and do it right, but they didn't have a few more years.

This book is baloney. But it may be "interesting" baloney. Yes, the Germans were "close," but close is a relative word.


28 posted on 03/14/2005 9:26:08 AM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Go to the air museum in Dayton Ohio, Wright-Patterson airbase.

Take a REAL CLOSE LOOK at the ME-1 and ME-2. They were light years ahead of their time.

What is overlooked by the nay-sayers is that our a-bomb techs had been their a-bomb techs till they either escaped or where exiled. I can't image that their peers who stayed behind suddenly got a case of amnesia or were turned dumb.

There may be more than a big kernal of truth here.

Whether they set off a device or not, I have to agree, if it had any type of radioactive material in it, it would be detectable till today. But, if they were simply testing a detonation explosive device, that's a different question.


29 posted on 03/14/2005 9:28:04 AM PST by Al Gator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Where's the "Not This Sh*t Again" guy?

This is sensationalist claptrap, based on obfuscation of the difference between a radiation "dirty bomb" (which any moron with a pile of radioactive junk and some high explosive can build) and a real honest-to-goodness nuclear warhead (which takes some fairly sophisticated physics and machining). The former can ruin your day if you're within a block or so when it goes off, but it is in no way comparable to the destructive capability of the latter.

30 posted on 03/14/2005 9:28:40 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

"That's my recollection of that somewhat overwrought History Channel production."

That's putting it mildly! The what-ifs postulated on that particular show required several layers of what-ifs to even be somewhat plausible.


31 posted on 03/14/2005 9:29:01 AM PST by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Also Heisenberg calculated that critical mass of U-235 was in the hundreds of tons rather than a few pounds. That caused the Nazis to give up on using U-235 for the bomb.
32 posted on 03/14/2005 9:29:11 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If they had caught our aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbor in 1941 we would all be speaking Japanese and German today.

No. The Japanese would have surrendered to the US in 1947, instead of 1945. More American Baby Boomers would not be here, but that's about it. The Japanese did not want the US, they wanted a free rein in Asia. The Chinese and the Koreans might be speaking Japanese, but not Americans.

33 posted on 03/14/2005 9:30:13 AM PST by elbucko (A Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

The writer postulates that the Germans were closer to the bomb than earlier believed, and I accept that.

Previously they were thought to be a thousand miles from the solution, now we can recognize they were 993 miles from the solution. Closer.


34 posted on 03/14/2005 9:31:45 AM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Equally unknown by most of the world is that the "fixin's "for a dirty bomb were shipped to Japan in a submarine. Japan had chosen San Francisco as the target, and it was only the decision by the U-boat captain to deliver the radioactive material to the US east coast, instead, that prevented the first use of a "dirty" bomb ever.


35 posted on 03/14/2005 9:32:28 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator

We did not get their technicians, we got their physicists. The engineers and techs on the US bomb program were virtually all home-grown.

All these guys are retired or dead now, but when I was in Engineering school back in the late '70's at UT, I took a course in nuclear reactor physics from a guy in the last stages of his career who worked as a junior physicist at Los Alamos on the Manhattan project. He had many fascinating stories.


36 posted on 03/14/2005 9:32:58 AM PST by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
Take a REAL CLOSE LOOK at the ME-1 and ME-2. They were light years ahead of their time.

What are the ME-1 and ME-2? Are you talking about the V-1 and V-2? Or maybe the Me-163 Komet and the Me-262 Schwalbe?

37 posted on 03/14/2005 9:33:20 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I met some guys who were buddies with my father. One flew fighters against the Japanese in the Pacific. We was an Ace. The other guys fought them hand to hand in jungles. Every body I talked to said they were fanatical to the death. I know a man who is famous today in Japan. He was educated at San Francisco State and Boalt Hall Law School at Berkeley. After graduating from law school, he went back home to fight for Japan. His entire family was Christian. His father was the first elected Premier of Japan in 1947. He invaded us again with the Datsun automobile and that invasion was a huge success.

Japan would have created havoc on the West Coast.

38 posted on 03/14/2005 9:35:06 AM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Japan would have created havoc on the West Coast.

Actually, they wouldn't--the IJN's reach just couldn't get all the way across the Pacific, and they could only reach Hawaii with a marginal force. An invasion of Hawaii was out of the question because of their sealift shortfall.

39 posted on 03/14/2005 9:37:11 AM PST by Poohbah ("Hee Haw" was supposed to be a television show, not a political movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

>>Previously they were thought to be a thousand miles from the solution, now we can recognize they were 993 miles from the solution. Closer.<<

8^>


40 posted on 03/14/2005 9:37:50 AM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson