It was not MSNBC. It was the Atlanta Business Chronicle last Friday, and MSNBC picked it up.
The business about having one of my briefs challenged back in 1999 on the basis of a court rule about fonts had not previously been reported.
It was a brief in response to a motion for summary judgment in a plaintiff's case I had on a contingency. Believe you me, the thought of having your brief, and thus your whole case and your financial well being, thrown out because of the difference between Courier 10 and Times New Roman 12 is enough to galvanize your attention on the subject of fonts.
Well, that explains it; I was beginning to think that MSNBC had actually done some in-depth reporting of their own.
Silly me.
It's a great story. I'm glad that someone finally went further than just finding out your name and political party affiliation.
Very nice article. Good to see something about you that's not a hit piece. You were most certainly in the right place at the right time!
I'm proud to be able to post this sitting here in my pajamas on a Saturday morning. :)