Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teplukin

The fact missing from the article is specifically what rule said that he should wear cuffs, and who made the rule. Was this a court decision? A state decision? I personally don't appreciate articles where I'm just as ignorant after reading it as before.


10 posted on 03/14/2005 3:21:37 AM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
The fact missing from the article is specifically what rule said that he should wear cuffs, and who made the rule. Was this a court decision? A state decision? I personally don't appreciate articles where I'm just as ignorant after reading it as before.

My point exactly Huck. Maybe it was a stupid court decision that caused this. Or maybe there were supposed to be multiple guards, but the other guards were taking a smoke break.

The only thing that recommends this essay is that very few trees were sacrificed in its creation.

15 posted on 03/14/2005 3:31:23 AM PST by Teplukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson