Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun nuts show their nuttiness
Macomb Daily ^ | 3-13-05 | Chad Selweski

Posted on 03/13/2005 1:13:50 PM PST by Dan from Michigan

Gun nuts show their nuttiness

PUBLISHED: March 13, 2005

Chad Selweski
Columnist

When the smoke cleared, it seemed that our Second Amendment soldiers had spent the past couple weeks shooting themselves in the foot.

Surely, the gun lovers out there have lost sight of the target when they start defending a person's right to carry rockets and grenades into a school and when they oppose attempts to keep high-powered weapons out of terrorists' hands.

But it appears the gun crowd has avoided a public backlash. Once again, they have dodged a bullet.

In Washington it was revealed that 58 potential gun buyers were identified last year as suspects on terrorist watch lists. But 47 of these alleged terrorists were cleared to go ahead and buy their assault weapons, high-powered rifles or whatever guns of choice.

For most Americans, this report brought a sense of outrage, a stunning example of bureaucratic incompetence. But for that slice of America known as the National Rifle Association, the report showed that things are working just fine.

The NRA, you see, has blocked attempts to use the federal watch lists to ban gun sales to terrorists. Osama's troops have Second Amendment rights, too.

Most Americans would say the NRA has gone too far. Well, in Arizona the NRA disciples went even further.

The Arizona House of Representatives passed a bill that would let people carry weapons -- guns, grenades, sawed-off shotguns, rockets, even land mines -- into schools, polling places and nuclear plants.

According to the Arizona Daily Star newspaper, essentially any weapon not banned by federal law could be carried anywhere, as long as the person claimed he was trying to protect himself.

The vote wasn't even close. The bill passed the House 30-16, but it didn't become law.

The lawmaker who introduced the bill eventually shelved it when he realized its full implications. He explained that the legislation had been crafted not by him but by a group of constituents he wouldn't identify -- no doubt the NRA or some like-minded group of gun nuts.

The gun lobby doesn't win 'em all, but when you're wielding the political firepower it possesses, close enough is good enough.

After all, the NRA killed the federal law that banned the sale of military-style rapid-fire assault weapons. The NRA has blocked laws requiring locks on all stored weapons. It's because of the NRA-style worship of the Second Amendment that we have a nation where it's legal to buy armor-piercing bullets, cop-killer guns, and pistols advertised with a "fingerprint-proof finish."

We all know that these products are marketed to the criminal element. But the zealots who pray at the right-to-bear-arms altar say no federal restrictions should be allowed for any weapons.

I would suspect that most law-abiding hunters and gun owners don't agree with some of the nuttier items on the NRA agenda. Others might argue that there's a slippery slope -- you allow some limitations on gun rights and it leads to more and more.

What I worry about is this country's unending supply of psychotics. The crazies we see in the news every day are infinitely scarier if they're joining a terrorist cell or arming themselves with weapons that can kill several people with each squeeze of the trigger.

The slippery slope of NRA thinking has led to this icy cold reality:

Those on the terror watch lists are barred from flying on an airplane or boarding a cruise ship but they can buy military-style weapons like an AK-47.

A suspected terrorist that is caught can be incarcerated and tortured for years at Guantanamo -- or worse, in some Middle Eastern hell hole. But only under very limited circumstances can we prevent the al-Qaida suspects who are on the loose from buying guns. Worse yet, we can't let the FBI use the gun-buying database to track these people down. That would violate the privacy rights promised to gun owners.

Only felons, illegal immigrants and the mentally ill can be blocked from making a purchase. And the gun purchase records must be destroyed after 24 hours, eliminating any paper trail to keep tabs on well-armed Islamic fanatics.

One senator blamed these pro-gun, soft-on-terrorism policies on the "twisted allegiances" between the NRA and the Bush administration.

Put another way, the gun nuts have become the advocates for the nuts, whether those inspired by Allah or those inspired by the devil.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: antis; bang; banglist; freedomgrabber; gunnuts; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
I don't think I need to post any type of alert. With a title like 'gun nuts', you know it's going to be bad.
1 posted on 03/13/2005 1:13:51 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Gun nuts show their nuttiness

Ever been to a gay convention? This reporter, Chad, would truly learn the meaning of nutty if he had.

2 posted on 03/13/2005 1:16:07 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

The more the left advocates gun control, the more people vote Republican. Fine with me.


3 posted on 03/13/2005 1:17:44 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Please identify the pending bill or legislation that would make it legal for people to carry rockets and grenades into a school.


4 posted on 03/13/2005 1:19:32 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The crazies we see in the news every day are infinitely scarier if they're joining a terrorist cell or arming themselves with weapons that can kill several people with each squeeze of the trigger.

How about a little more hyperbole there, Chad?

5 posted on 03/13/2005 1:19:58 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Reminds me, I gotta renew my NRA membership.


6 posted on 03/13/2005 1:20:09 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

---The slippery slope of NRA thinking has led to this icy cold reality:---

Chad is in no danger of winning any literary awards for his work, I'm afraid.


7 posted on 03/13/2005 1:21:32 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

right!


8 posted on 03/13/2005 1:22:49 PM PST by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The NRA, you see, has blocked attempts to use the federal watch lists to ban gun sales to terrorists. Osama's troops have Second Amendment rights, too.

Well Chad, old boy. If we are going to suspend the Bill of Rights in order to stop terrorism, let's do it in order. before we get to the Second Amendment, lets trample all over the First. I'm sure you are with me in banning their deadly recruitment efforts in mosques. I'm sure you won't have any problem shutting down the free practice of Islam and banning people who advocate the literal interpretation of the Koran.

Once you're with me on suspending the First Amendment Chad, I'll follow you all the way through the Bill of Rights, cheering you on as you trample each one. Call me when you're ready. Though I won't be holding my breath.

9 posted on 03/13/2005 1:23:54 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: ElkGroveDan

You need to send that to Chadwick in an E-mail.


11 posted on 03/13/2005 1:25:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
It always strikes me as curious when a urnalist from one geographical area (in this case Michigan) takes pot shots at the governance of another geographical area (Arizona). Why isn't Chad taking the local dog catcher to task for not picking up enough poo?

Perhaps it's because he can pretend he has anything useful to contribute without running the risk of pi$$ing anyone off...
12 posted on 03/13/2005 1:25:46 PM PST by rockrr (Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sender

That lie from the left is one of their favorite "arguments". Most of their sheep won't bother to check the laws for themselves, leaving it to the Dan Rather's to educate them regarding firearms.


13 posted on 03/13/2005 1:27:57 PM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

"A well educated public, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to read Chad Selewski shall not be allowed."


14 posted on 03/13/2005 1:30:13 PM PST by groanup (http://www.fairtax.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

15 posted on 03/13/2005 1:30:26 PM PST by aomagrat (Where weapons are not allowed, it is best to carry weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
What a fag.

See post #2. I take it back.

16 posted on 03/13/2005 1:31:04 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Only felons, illegal immigrants and the mentally ill can be blocked from making a purchase.

That's right, Comrade.

Like it or not, everyone within the borders of the United States has the right to due process.
17 posted on 03/13/2005 1:31:40 PM PST by holymoly (It's not me, it's the CAFFEINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Like it or not, everyone within the borders of the United States has the right to due process.

And it is up to our gov't to track the terrorists and prevent them from getting IDs they can use to purchase weapons.

Another reason to oppose driver's licenses for illegals.

18 posted on 03/13/2005 1:33:17 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Lol. I liked your #9 a lot. Agree you should send it to him.


19 posted on 03/13/2005 1:33:27 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Due process only counts if you're for gays, against churches, a member of the ACLU and that ilk, Democrat or Liberal.

All others are guilty until proven innocent especially so if you believe in upholding the 2nd amendment.


20 posted on 03/13/2005 1:34:06 PM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson