I love how the Left can't criticize No Child except to say it's "underfunded". That's pretty weak. Lieberman should be bounced because he supported a program which only got tens of millions, and didn't get 100% of the $ some want? Instead of praising him for doing SOMEthing, he gets denounced for not having the perfect program, perfectly funded. They'd rather there be no education program? (*I* would prefer that, but these are libs we're talking about.
Very weak stuff.
Only a tin-foil hat liberal could call a 50% increase in education spending "underfunded".
This needs to be the issue to illustrate how out of touch these people are with society.
That would be 100 plus%.The libs would never be satisfied with any figure.The haters of capitalism have no problem with it as long as it enriches their friends and special interests.