Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
Yes, Condi would be better than hillary. But I refuse to vote for a pro-abort,...

So you are saying that if it is Clinton vs Rice, you would stay home?

Choosing a pro-life candidate is reserved for the primaries.

Choosing the best leader is reserved for the general election.

To stay home is a dereliction of duty.

20 posted on 03/13/2005 12:48:54 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Erik Latranyi

Sorry, but the Republicans have pulled that a few times too often. Some of us get to vote in primaries, but as a rule the party leadership choose the candidates. Again and again they have picked a RINO, under the assumption that conservative voters will have no choice in November but to vote for the least worst candidate.

The last time they did that it was Bob Dole, and it cost them the election. Normally I would agree with you, but with the end of Roe v. Wade in sight and a chance to reverse the cultural decay of the past 50 years in sight, a lot of people will be very, very unhappy if they are subjected to bait and switch yet again.

I have said I would vote for Condi if she promised to take a pro-life stance. She has unequivocally rejected that option.


40 posted on 03/13/2005 1:45:32 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi

You may call me "derelict."


65 posted on 03/13/2005 3:59:19 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson