Wrong again – I provided a link to another thread that documents your preference for unsubstantiated, pseudo-historical claims.
;>)
Picking nits again I see. - Anyone can go to that thread and establish the facts of our exchange.. No one will because its only important to you. -- Your obsession with anyone that challenges your misconceptions about history is getting worse. Bringing up that thread is really reaching, you know..
LOL! Apparently to you, documented historical facts are “nits,” and historical documentation (including the proposed State constitution, and Jefferson's Declaration of 1825) represent “misconceptions about history!” But please, tell us again how Utah was refused admission to the union in 1850 on the basis of the (nonexistent) "State religion" issue, and its supposed conflict with the 1st Amendment...
;>)
That 'nit-pick' has been addressed ad nauseum. Get a life.
Obviously, to you the facts are “nits” – to most other people they are somewhat more important. I suggest that you “get a life” that’s a little more connected to reality.
;>)
You are reduced to repeating your petty little points.. -- Please, find some new ploys, - you're boring everyone.
It’s unfortunate that you consider documented facts to be “petty little points,” or “ploys,” or “boring.” That says a lot about you, my friend...
;>)
Yawn. -- We've argued those same points over & over again, and your obsession drives you to continue. -- How sad.
Why don't you find something else to do? - Someone else to pester?