To: MisterRepublican; Ragtime Cowgirl; Radix; HiJinx; Spiff; JackelopeBreeder; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; ...
Folks,..... help me! Am I reading this right? Is the NYT admitting that GW was right? Was there WMD in IRAQ and Saddam shipped 'em out.
Uh, oh..... trouble they are pointing to supporting GW on Syria and Iran being the receivers and trouble makers in the middle east too.
Am I seeing things? Maybe PIGs really can fly.
37 posted on
03/13/2005 7:43:32 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
Folks,..... help me! Am I reading this right? Is the NYT admitting that GW was right? Was there WMD in IRAQ and Saddam shipped 'em out.
Nope. READ THE STORIES CAREFULLY.
The stories are saying that some dual-use materials and plants that could conceivably be used to make WMDs (NO actual WMDs themselves) that were tagged and regularly inspected by the UN, and fully declared and known, were looted and shipped out of Iraq AFTER the US invaded.
To: SandRat
Folks,..... help me! Am I reading this right? Is the NYT admitting that GW was right? Nope. They're quoting an Iraqi official, not claiming it themselves. It's basically just Bush-bashing.
46 posted on
03/13/2005 7:47:05 AM PST by
Grut
To: SandRat
See post 39. Newsmax spun the story much, much, more pro-Bush than the actual NYT article was.
48 posted on
03/13/2005 7:47:38 AM PST by
Behind Liberal Lines
(Ann Coulter for Cornell Trustee:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1344035/posts)
To: SandRat
You are reading the article wrong.
Newsmax is just hyping up things up as usual.
164 posted on
03/13/2005 12:06:40 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson