Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RottiBiz; usgator; Strategerist; Phsstpok; SeaBiscuit; Howlin; MeekOneGOP; Dog
The threat posed by these types of facilities was cited by the Bush administration as a reason for invading Iraq, but the installations were left largely unguarded by allied forces in the chaotic months after the invasion. I believe the NYT's underlying purpose for this article -- to once again blame the President -- can be found in this paragraph.

I think you nailed it....somewhat similar to the news reports that always cite how a dangerous SUV caused an accident, without mentioning the dangerous driver.....

Bush was concerned about the driver of the WMD program....

176 posted on 03/13/2005 1:21:24 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion; Alamo-Girl; Strategerist; rwfromkansas; jriemer; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; ...
See comment # 176 and #81, in trying to get a clue about what NY Times is trying to do with this article.

I mean, where is any real new news,.....the news is only that the Slimes has repackaged the facts with some kind of follow on intent!

179 posted on 03/13/2005 1:28:20 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson