Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
To me .. this would be done because the people want Diana's heir to succeed to the throne - not Charles (whom many rightfully believe betrayed Diana).

Who could sort out that mess?

I just think that if they want to save the royal family, they need a new one.

I nominate Keith Richards!

12 posted on 03/12/2005 8:07:17 PM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Scenic Sounds

Sounds like a winner, you could have a King that would be on the throne for the next hundred years. If the Drugs and Alcohol haven't killed him, the only thing that is going to take him out is going to be a nuclear bomb. LOL


17 posted on 03/12/2005 8:25:48 PM PST by MKM1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Scenic Sounds

Well .. it has been done before. Elizabeth's father was the YOUNGER BROTHER - her Uncle abdicated the throne. But the Uncle didn't have any children so it automatically went to the younger brother. Since Charles does have children - the parliment could skip a generation and go to William as the heir, instead of a younger brother.

Well .. good luck with the new family idea. Quite frankly I don't care what they do.


19 posted on 03/12/2005 8:29:18 PM PST by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson