"I presume the Times sees this looting as evidence Bush was remiss."Wasn't looting at Iraqi bases brought up prior to Bush's re-election,with the inference being Bush,Rumsfeld,etc were somehow negligent in securing bases?I agree this probably won't do any damage.Sounds to me like the Times is getting desperate for an angle.
Yes. This article even mentions the same base that was used to slam Bush right before the election, el Quaqua or whatever it's called.