Replies

What I have found is that virtually everyone here supports Schwarzenegger, but not some of his policy ideas.

The actions/policies and his appointments are indeed what is important. You will find many here who are critical of those actions to date; I am one of the most vocal (ask Southack! lol).

I am hopeful that he will make the obvious choice on the spending cap and endorse John Campbell's initiative (although I fear he will go with the bogus one offered by Hauck). Time will tell. So far, his record is nothing to celebrate, IMO.

And the total lack of loyalty to President George W. Bush is appalling. Please don't claim to be Republican...

I am a registered Republican and voted for Bush twice. I do not support him on illegal immigration or what I consider to be excessive spending. I vote for those who I think will best represent me, I do not pledge to be "loyal" to that person regardless of what they do.

I think you are trying to put people in too few boxes and thinking that one must pledge their "loyalty" to an individual politician. You seem to conclude that if one doesn't think favorably of Parsky that they must support Schwarzenegger. Or if they are critical of Parsky, they do not support Bush. That is so far from reality, I can only suggest that you stick around, read, and learn. Your conclusions are totally inconsistent with the postings and articles I read here at FR (and I read most every thread posted to the California topic).

By the way, you still didn't answer my question. If you want honest responses to your questions, perhaps you should go back through this thread, and the other one you started, and answer the many that were posted to you which remain unanswered.