I state,as FACT,that in 1958 Tuition at Harvard was $1,250.00 a year and you then go on to say that I claimed that 1) it was 1951, 2) and even at that,you imply that my FACT is wrong.
That $22,000 a year for a doctor,is an average for 1958.
Wages haven't remained stagnant. The young man who went to Harvard,as a freshman,in 1958,makes far more than $22,000,as a doctor now and takes home more than his father,even with taxes and insurance.
Should you finally find hard,cold facts and post them,as I repeatedly have,you stop making silly pronouncements about things you have no grasp of,we just might find common ground...when you come to my side. :-)
That's what I said. You're repeating just what I wrote. Do you dispute the numbers? And if you say 1958, that makes the case even stronger. The run-up occured in less time. It took fewer years. Just read what I wrote, and look at the percentages. Do you think they are that far off? And if you do, tell me why, specifically - if you can.