Replies

"We should not have the federal government in a position where it is forcing its views on one side or the other"

That sounds like she would be for overturning Roe vs Wade. I doubt she'd ever say that much though.

IMO, sounds as though she's advocating a return to state rights. The way it was before the court overstepped its authority.

That isn't an objectionable position. That is what I am aiming towards.

I don't wish the Court nor Government to legislate the issue. The people should determine their feelings on the matter. Giving people back the right to vote at the ballot box is the first step.

I think we'll eventually win the battle if people are allowed to vote their conscience.

">>---"We should not have the federal government in a position where it is forcing its views on one side or the other"

>>>>>That sounds like she would be for overturning Roe vs Wade. I doubt she'd ever say that much though. "

Do you think so? I was greatly disappointed this Sunday morning when I heard her say those things.

"In an interview with editors and reporters in the office of the editor in chief at The Washington Times, she said she would not want the government "forcing its views" on abortion."

ATTENTION WORLD: The government will always force it's views on you about something; whether using a seat belt, skipping taxes or abortion.

I was disappointed in Condi - I know she has to be much smarter than that.

And again, she sounds like the Democratic Candidate every four years.

"I'm personally against Abortion" ---- Why? "Because it kills an innocent baby" -- So you think it should be legal to kill an innocent baby? --- Why yes I do think it should be legal to kill them --- They Don't look like us.