Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
I've seen McCain in person a few times during the debates. When the cameras are off him, it is obvious the man suffers from serious mental health problems.

How so? I've never been a McCain fan, but, in evaluating the possible candidates who could beat Hillary Clinton, McCain is near the top of the list. If Owens of Colorado, or some other leading light is going to give it a go, they've got to start building an organization soon and making some headlines.

Rudy could do it, but he arouses negative far right passions with his abortion and gun stances.

I may be alone in this, but I don't think Condoleeza Rice has the fire in her belly to run for president. She's simply an unknown campaign quantity.

944 posted on 03/11/2005 9:49:43 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

Is FR hiccupping or is it my system? Veeery slow.

During the 2000 debates, I saw McCain twice with the other Reublican candidates. In Columbia and Aiken, SC. In Columbia I sat with our Mayor and state Senator and their impression was the same as mine so I don't think I'm too off base here.

McCain, when the camera was not on him paced liked a caged animal. He looked angry enough to chew glass and a couple of times seemed to "come to" and realize he was on stage and although not on camera, was in full view of hundreds of people.

Around the 2000 election, there was a small one paragraph article in the Washington Post Page Six section, IIRC, that said Washington insiders KNEW that McCain did not have the temperment or stability to be president. There was concern that he was doing so well at one point because of his instability.


961 posted on 03/11/2005 9:55:12 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
...McCain is near the top of the list.

I'd hate to see what's at the bottom of your list.

Let me ask you this: Do you honestly think that Bush would leave the GOP high and dry up to and through his second election without some indication as to his successor?

For a guy who seems to have an uncanny knack for anticipating, he would be a joke for not letting the party know that he's got a guy/gal in mind.

For what it's worth I think he'll probably let Cheney retire early and get Condi or Jeb or somebody to take the VP slot. Otherwise he's sold the party out bigtime.

Then again Michael Steele (Lt. Gov. of Maryland) has said he'd serve at the President's request in any capacity. Now that would rock.

981 posted on 03/11/2005 10:00:50 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
How so? I've never been a McCain fan, but, in evaluating the possible candidates who could beat Hillary Clinton, McCain is near the top of the list. If Owens of Colorado, or some other leading light is going to give it a go, they've got to start building an organization soon and making some headlines.

I think the most "establishment" choice is going to be George Allen. I'm seeing a lot more of him in the news.

He's my "third" choice as of now(behind Governors Sanford and Pawlenty), but I have no problems with him currently, and give him credit for sticking his neck out on those gun votes.

McCain would get run out extremely quickly in the next primary. Most republicans I know can't stand him, and that's not just the gun owners. They just don't trust him.

1,094 posted on 03/11/2005 11:37:07 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (Mark Sanford for President in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson