Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
there is equivocating between the unborn slaughter for convenience and collateral damage in wartime

But you are doing the same thing. Allowing an exception for rape, incest, and when the life of the mother is threatened is not advocating "the slaughter of the unborn for convenience."

360 posted on 03/11/2005 7:38:05 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls

Where did I say what I would allow?

At this point I would be quite happy to overturn Roe and let the states fight it out for now. The Blue states would continue to kill themselves off I'd reckon.

The only thing that will end it permanently here is probably an amendment to the Constitution.

I'm too old to see things relative anymore. Abortion is killing to me. Wartime casualties while on occasion lamentable are different. I'm arbitrary about it admittedly.


395 posted on 03/11/2005 7:43:29 PM PST by wardaddy (I don't think Muslims are good for America....just a gut instinct thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson