To: F16Fighter
I will not vote for anyone who disavows the death of innocent life. Lots of innocent Iraqis have been killed as collateral deaths in military actions in Iraq. It's sad, but it cannot be avoided, just minimized, in the pursuit of our goals in Iraq. Does that mean you don't support Bush?
185 posted on
03/11/2005 7:12:01 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
boy howdy
that is a lefty canard counter....I'm surprised.
there is equivocating between the unborn slaughter for convenience and collateral damage in wartime.
199 posted on
03/11/2005 7:13:55 PM PST by
wardaddy
(I don't think Muslims are good for America....just a gut instinct thing.)
To: FreedomCalls
"Lots of innocent Iraqis have been killed as collateral deaths in military actions in Iraq. It's sad, but it cannot be avoided, just minimized, in the pursuit of our goals in Iraq. Does that mean you don't support Bush?"I'm referring to the 'War on Babies'...
But now that you mention "Bush," he's not fighting the 'War on Illegals Invaders' very well, is he?
To: FreedomCalls
There is a moral difference between an act that has undesirable consequences and an act that has an evil object.
-A8
1,492 posted on
03/13/2005 1:35:25 PM PST by
adiaireton8
("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson