>>I think you mean inalienable, not unalienable.<<
A typo, you'll notice I correctly used the term "inalienable" in post 66. Thanks for the correction, though, although it is hairsplitting.
>>My personal views have no bearing here. The federal government has long recognized limits, e.g., abortion.<<
The Constitution says Terri Schiavo has an inalienable right to life. The pro-aborts' argument (a lame one) is that a fetus is not a human life.
That cannot be said about Terry Schiavo. She is a human being who has an inalienable right to life.
And if your personal views have no bearing here, then why in the world are you sharing them on a public forum? That makes no sense. The ONLY reason you are here is that you think your personal views have some bearing on the issue.
My personal views have no bearing on what Congress will or won't do, what the federal courts will or won't do. They will do what they will do.