Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bad advice to Bush blamed for Social Security struggle
Washington Times ^ | Mar 11 05 | Ralph Hallow

Posted on 03/11/2005 3:11:38 PM PST by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: churchillbuff

Churchillbluff=All Bush Bad News, All The Time.


41 posted on 03/11/2005 3:57:48 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

All of those Cos. are US incorporated (esp. US airlines!)


42 posted on 03/11/2005 3:57:49 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Bush actually said he hadn't ruled out raising the cap...at least initially that is what he referred to.......


43 posted on 03/11/2005 3:58:02 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Social Security isn't the desease, it is just another symptom of a failing economic policy.

Social Security is the disease. It is a pyramid scheme and is the single largest fraud in the history of the world by several orders of magnitude. No amount of increase in GDP can change the fact that it is a pyramid scheme. There are only four ways to "save" SS, 1) raise the payroll tax, 2) cut benefits, 3) the government invest the money in private companies to provide a decent rate of return (~7%) 4) institute and gradually increased private accounts. The first two only perpetuate the fraud and postpone its ultimate collapse, the third would result in the government owning a substantial share of American corporations allowing the government to control those corporations and the fourth option is Bush's plan.

I vote for Bush's plan.

44 posted on 03/11/2005 3:58:26 PM PST by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

No. My understanding is that when asked if he'd raise the cap, he says what he always says about this stuff: "Everything is on the table."

But if anyone believes this president, who has drastically cut taxes and wants more tax cuts, is going to raise the cap, I have a bridge to sell them.


45 posted on 03/11/2005 3:59:31 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

Pal, there is no lockbox, only US savings bonds backing up the debt, the sooner you realize it's a ponzi scheme the sooner you realize SS needs to be dumped like a bad girlfriend.


46 posted on 03/11/2005 4:00:57 PM PST by John Lenin (It's the things below the surface you can't erase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

you are so right......as an Investment Broker I'll bet only 20% or so actually invest the correct amounts with many people just buying up material goods hoping that retirement will take care of itself.......if they aren't force to invest, they won't do it until it is too late......


47 posted on 03/11/2005 4:01:13 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

their = they're - sorry


48 posted on 03/11/2005 4:01:26 PM PST by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

the pubbies rarely explain themselves well.

meanwhile, the feminists and socialists control most of the tv and newspapers, so their message gets out.


49 posted on 03/11/2005 4:03:36 PM PST by ken21 ( today's luxury development. tomorrow's slum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I agree.....but since he did not do that, then he wins the McCain award for pandering to any number of constituencies....he is playing politics along with the rest of them Repubs and Dems alike
50 posted on 03/11/2005 4:03:51 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

Ah, ok, the investment letter is a bunch of BS.


51 posted on 03/11/2005 4:05:51 PM PST by John Lenin (It's the things below the surface you can't erase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

Bravo! Unfortunately it is easier said than done. :(


52 posted on 03/11/2005 4:07:53 PM PST by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

B.S.

Some Republicans are just trying to figger a way to surrender again to the Democrats.

President Bush is right on this.

What these old codgers that are fighting President Bush's social security reform plan don't realize is that if they succeed,they are signing their death warrants.

Once the younger people see their social security taxes go up to 30-35% of their earnings and their benefits cut to next to nothing because of what they [the old codgers] did,they will get rid of the old codgers.


53 posted on 03/11/2005 4:10:39 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

FWIW, Cheney was on Rush's show today and left no doubt that personal accounts remain the cornerstone of SS reform. He was emphatic in his support of them and torpedoed the rumors that the White House has given up on the plan.


54 posted on 03/11/2005 4:12:58 PM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sport

What's making me mad is how the older generation is untouchable and anyone under 67 right now is being asked to take all the cuts. That leaves me with 20 years to readjust my plans while the old folks had their whole life to plan for retirement. It's about ot hit the fan sooner than these morons realize.


55 posted on 03/11/2005 4:13:37 PM PST by John Lenin (It's the things below the surface you can't erase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Social security is just a mandatory insurance plan. It forces us collectively to plan for our retirement. That the moneys have been squandered by out public servants is another big issue (perhaps a criminal breach of a fiduciary relationship). But, the program itself does not destroy capital. We have the balance of our paychecks, and so far it seems that very little of that tends to be invested or saved; would the elimination of social security miraculously change that kind of behavior?

You do not understand the way of Social Security actually works. The money you pay into the the system is not saved waiting for you to someday withdraw it. The money deducted from your paycheck goes to pay current retirees Social Security check. There is some money left over so the "Trust Fund" is currently growing, but it will soon start to shrink to nothing. If nothing is done, in the next 10 years, the "Trust Fund" will have zero dollars in it and the government will have three options, 1) cut benefits, 2) increase the payroll tax or 3) print money, none of which are in any way desirable. For many younger workers the money we are paying into Social Security is not being saved it is being squandered. The Greatest Generation was truly great and set this country on a solid footing, but they got suckered by the fraud that is Social Security and their children and grandchildren are the ones left to pay the bill.

56 posted on 03/11/2005 4:13:38 PM PST by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

You can read the transcript here >>>

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031105/content/eib_interview.guest.html


57 posted on 03/11/2005 4:14:58 PM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

Ahem. This IS about politics so of course the president is playing.


58 posted on 03/11/2005 4:16:19 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub
you are so right......as an Investment Broker I'll bet only 20% or so actually invest the correct amounts with many people just buying up material goods hoping that retirement will take care of itself.......if they aren't force to invest, they won't do it until it is too late......

Ironically the reason many do not save enough for retirement is that they believe that the government will save them through Social Security, which is a cruel hoax. If the only purpose of Social Security is to force saving for retirement then it should be scrapped immediately and converted completely to mandatory private saving accounts.

59 posted on 03/11/2005 4:21:22 PM PST by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Pal, there is no lockbox, only US savings bonds backing up the debt

Those bonds are the only thing backing the rest of your US dollar denominated assets. I am OK with that. We just need to work on keeping those funds behind the snapping jaws of political death; something that would rend any politician reaching for those funds into shreds.
60 posted on 03/11/2005 4:22:50 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson