Skip to comments.
Police Accused Of Tasering Suspect To Get Urine Sample
WFTV.com ^
| UPDATED: 10:39 am EST March 11, 2005
| A.P.
Posted on 03/11/2005 9:49:39 AM PST by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
03/11/2005 9:49:39 AM PST
by
Abathar
To: Abathar
I bet one tazer hit in the right place would have worked for me.
2
posted on
03/11/2005 9:50:46 AM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for not reading the whole article since 1999)
To: Abathar
talk about unreasonable search & seizure
3
posted on
03/11/2005 9:50:48 AM PST
by
mondonico
(Peace through Superior Firepower)
To: Abathar
The Police State, Chapter 12.
To: mondonico
5
posted on
03/11/2005 9:52:01 AM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for not reading the whole article since 1999)
To: Abathar
My only comments:
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
So much for being secure in person, or being forced to testify via samples. . .
6
posted on
03/11/2005 9:54:14 AM PST
by
Salgak
((don't mind me, the Orbital Mind Control Lasers are making me write this. . . . FNORD!!))
To: Abathar
That will do it ever time. Need to watch out with this tactic though, might get a bonus.
7
posted on
03/11/2005 9:54:20 AM PST
by
traderrob6
(http://www.exposingtheleft.blogspot.com)
To: Abathar
sounds like someone was pissed off.
8
posted on
03/11/2005 9:55:26 AM PST
by
isom35
To: Abathar
This will end up being the most expensive cup of pee ever.
9
posted on
03/11/2005 9:57:40 AM PST
by
gdani
To: Abathar
10
posted on
03/11/2005 9:57:45 AM PST
by
RushCrush
(I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
To: Abathar
By the time the Florida tax payers are through paying lawsuit and settlement fees that will be one expensive forced urination.
11
posted on
03/11/2005 9:57:53 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Who is General Chat?)
To: mondonico
I guess that little bit about "nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" doesn't apply in the WOD.
12
posted on
03/11/2005 9:58:28 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Abathar
Couldn't they have just given him a water pill so that he would be peeing all over the place?
It isnt like the cops needed to know whether or not he was on cocaine, he already told them.
13
posted on
03/11/2005 9:58:48 AM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(Get real and show some class.....)
To: Abathar
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
14
posted on
03/11/2005 9:59:10 AM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
To: gdani
Unfortunately, this dimwit will probably waste it on drugs. (The "dimwit" comment refers to his choice to take drugs at all and not to his failure to be a good little prisoner.)
15
posted on
03/11/2005 10:00:40 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Abathar
"hospital protocol calls for urine samples whenever patients say they have taken drugs or alcohol."
Hospital protocol ???? So if another patient refused to give a urine sample in a similar case, a taser would be in order??
Sounds like the hospital was trying to get the urine sample to cover themselves to avoid a lawsuit, but then got one instead.
Unfortunately, it sounds like the taxpayers and the hospital will be paying a nice settlement to this jerk , drug addict.
To: MikeinIraq
You know lawyers. They would figure out a way to make his confession inadmissible. Hard evidence was the key. Does it make it right -- no!
17
posted on
03/11/2005 10:06:15 AM PST
by
dhs12345
To: dhs12345
yeah but I dont know...I think a good prosecutor could make a reasonable case for probable cause since the guy had ADMITTED to using Cocaine.
Just for Devil's advocate sake....
18
posted on
03/11/2005 10:07:37 AM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(Get real and show some class.....)
To: Abathar
Florida has a long history of police abuse. Perhaps it is related to the many decades of Liberal influence?
Any ideas, anyone?
To: MikeinIraq
The admission is indeed probable cause - for the guy's arrest. The cop's testimony to the admission would have been quite enough. Using a taser to gain physical evidence, however, was a mistake. The cop might as well pulled out his ASP baton and beat the piss out the guy, or shot him. It's all the same, and it's all excessive force, no matter how you parse it.</p>
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson