Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone

So. . . . if there were no WMD, why the need to bribe?


5 posted on 03/11/2005 6:29:16 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lee'sGhost
But of course this is just one guy who says Iraqis attempted to bribe him. No corroborating information, other than one little article (and constant barragement by FoxNews with this none story later today and the next few weeks doesn't count either). And of course there's the minor issue of no WMDs having been found (and please no vial in a refrigerator stories, I'm talking about the thousands of pounds and liters that were supposedly unaccounted for). Also please note the person did not accept the bribe and still did not find WMDs. If I were Tariq Aziz I'd be offering money to make sure I got the best possible report so my nation wasn't needlessly attacked as well. It's human nature. Oh, but I forgot the WMDs were being shipped to Syria, Iraq, fill in the blank of a Middle Eastern nation...Which nation was it that had to be attacked next to 'defend freedom' or whatever the current excuse is?

When exactly did the switch happen that to be called conservative one had to quit calling for limited government only to be replaced with a feeling of false nationalism? 'Spreading democracy' isn't a conservative function.

15 posted on 03/11/2005 6:43:55 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson