I disagree. If Michael and the Schindlers sat down together, as Bishop Lynch has recommended, in a neutral setting, with a neutral counselor who is compassionate towards all sides, I think they could come up with something that is considerate of the grief of all the parties.
I do know this has been tried before. Jay Wolfson came very close to reaching an agreement. I seriously doubt another attempt would yield any better results.
I don't get it - why does there have to be ANY grief??? If Terri could be given to her parents to care for her, who would be grieving??
In the begining, he told too many people that he didn't know what Terri would want. I know they've been "discredited" but it's hard to believe that they are all lying and only he is telling the truth.
This is a display of power. Judge Greer rules in his favour regardless of law and other evidence and Schiavo knows this. This is spite. Keep in mind the guardianship laws that have been flouted. I've already listed a few in another post. And Schiavos own testimony about his being angry at the Schindlers. It's posted on this thread too. Even Schiavo isn't claiming that Terri wished to be buried in Pa as her life and family were in Fla. This is an angry man who no longer has a use for Terri or her family.
If you don't believe that, consider that the last time Terri was starved for 6 days, not only did his fiancee stand guard to make sure no one tried to feed her, so did Jodi Centezones mother. I believe that to be extremely cruel and insulting. This time, the Schindlers have a court order allowing them to be present.