[ContraryMary]

I say that's your interpretation of the law, based upon an incomplete knowledge of the testimony and hearings over the years.

[jwalsh07]

You can say what you want but I noticed you failed to answer the question I asked regarding if MS MAY have a conflict of interest.

I understand your reticence to answer because any rational person would say "Of course he may have a conflict" and by that acknowledgement you admit the Judge has erred.

A bit of intellectual honesty goes a long way.