Now you are changing the subject. You said: "something that falls under the definition of euthanasia. Euthanasia is ASSISTING someone in ending their life."
That's why I said to start another thread, because no one is ASSISTING Terri. They are MURDERING Terri.
Then you said: "No one is sticking a needle in Terry, or doing anything to her other than removing a feeding tube so that she can be in her natural state. It is called not using any artificial means to keep someone alive, especially as the husband states that his wife said she would not want to be kept alive in the kind of circumstance she is now in."
Then when I told you that many people use feeding tubes, some of them are children, YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT and said that they are not PVS.
Well since you decided to CHANGE THE SUBJECT, Terri is not PVS. People with PVS don't laugh a jokes, or cry, and say a few words, and try to talk. Terri could talk with THERAPY, but Michael won't allow THERAPY.
BTW, you must know that you are wrong, otherwise, you WOULD NOT CHANGE THE SUBJECT when losing an argument.
"People with PVS don't laugh a jokes, or cry, and say a few words, and try to talk."
And neither does Terri. You live in a fantasy world.
And, BTW, I can't continue to argue with someone who is irrational when it comes to the Schiavo case. So, good nite, and sleep tight.