I agree. I have read endless docs for this case. God and Judge Greer have alot more info than I do. When I read her discharge report(from 1990) and reasearched the diagnosis, I saw the gravity of the brain injury. I also believe the judge has followed the law as written. The responsibility lies with the legistlature, and I'm not sure the new law they propose is quite fair to people like my husband, who has made his wishes clear and expects me to honor them.
The new law does not affect those whose wishes are in writing.
Well now that's an interesting statement considering Michael disagreed before he got the money.
I also believe the judge has followed the law as written.
Has he? Where is his clear and convincing evidence that this is what Terri would want? A supposed off hand statement?
Is it unfair to ask your husband to write down on a piece of paper that he wants his food AND WATER stopped?