Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MCCAIN, FEINGOLD, WEINTRAUB TELL BLOGGERS NOT TO WORRY
National Review Online ^ | 3/9/05 | jim geraghty

Posted on 03/10/2005 6:57:36 AM PST by Valin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2005 6:57:38 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

I'll stop worring when CFR is repealed. Until then, from my cold dead mouse hand ....


2 posted on 03/10/2005 6:58:47 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Don't worry.

Yeah, right.

And the IRS man: "I'm here to help you."


3 posted on 03/10/2005 6:59:50 AM PST by KidGlock (W-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Is there any support at all for repealing, or at least fixing?


4 posted on 03/10/2005 6:59:54 AM PST by johnb838 ("You Have Ruled, Now Let Us See You Enforce" Need some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin

My question would be that my free speech has been drowned out 60 days before and election already. Why wouldn't McCain/Feingold try to drown my electronic voice?


5 posted on 03/10/2005 7:02:06 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I do not trust these totalitarians and the "activist judiciary" which stole my First Amendment rights... and has obvious plans to further erode the Bill of Rights.

The democrats' only hope for return to power is to severely damage free speech.

And McCain? He took the sole traitorous RINO role in the evil "campaign reform" after his shame at being one of the infamous Keating Five. The dude is unfit to be President.

6 posted on 03/10/2005 7:04:01 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Personally, I think that the only time blog's SHOULD be regulated is when they ARE raising funds for a political candidate and ONLY then.
8 posted on 03/10/2005 7:05:10 AM PST by PRSop2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister

Why wouldn't McCain/Feingold try to drown my electronic voice?


Well we can't have just ANYBODY speaking up about politics. Particularly right before an election when most people are paying attention.

Now sit down, shut up, and send in your money!


9 posted on 03/10/2005 7:05:28 AM PST by Valin (DARE to be average!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Uh-oh. They're from the government, and they're here to help.


10 posted on 03/10/2005 7:06:12 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRSop2000

Why then? Is fund raising a bad thing?


11 posted on 03/10/2005 7:06:43 AM PST by Valin (DARE to be average!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

CONGRES SHALL PASS NO LAW! These guys refuse to remember that. AND THE SURPREMES BACKED THEM UP. They all got to go.


12 posted on 03/10/2005 7:07:13 AM PST by Lowell (The voice from beyond the edge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Valin
The Supreme Court will save us -- with us being politicians and MSM members who don't like being criticized by the peasantry.
13 posted on 03/10/2005 7:07:32 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
First of all, we're not the speech police. We don't tell private citizens what they can or cannot say, on the Internet or anywhere else. The FEC regulates campaign finance. There's got to be some money involved, or it's out of our jurisdiction.

I spend money to connect to the internet. Therefore, if I communicate about political topics over the internet money is involved so it is under the FEC jurisdiction.

The broadcast controls were relatively easy for the FEC to implement. The FEC just had to aim at the actual broadcasters and their government issued broadcast license to enforce the rules. Clear Channel (etc.) wouldn't risk their licenses to allow people to express their opinion. However with the internet there aren't just points the government can apply pressure to shut people up. Even if they try to shut down onshore webhosts, there is still the rest of the world to host blogs of American citizens. To enforce any rules, they will have to arrest the people with opinions rather than just leaning on broadcasters. Imagine the outrage if the Robinsons had to do the perp walk for Free Republic.

Every time I hear McCain talk about Campaign Finance Reform, I just replace whatever he tries to say with "We have to destroy the First Amendment in order to save it."

14 posted on 03/10/2005 7:08:53 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
"And McCain? He took the sole traitorous RINO role in the evil "campaign reform" after his shame at being one of the infamous Keating Five. The dude is unfit to be President.
"

This dude is unfit for any public job, including the Senate.
But just like West Virginny and their Senator Byrd (kkk WV) the rest of us have no control over who or what they send to Washington.
15 posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:15 AM PST by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Suuuuure.. Just like the anti-gun lobby isn't there to try to ban ALL firearms. Just the ones that are too big (.50bmg), too small (saturday night specials), too black and scary (AR15), too tactical (HK USP Tactical), 'armor piercing' (FN 5.7), sniper rifles (Remington 700), streetsweepers (12 gauge shotguns).

Those BCR stooges will use exactly the same strategy to nullify the 1st Amendment, like they did the 2nd.
16 posted on 03/10/2005 7:11:41 AM PST by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Valin
McCain you will never get my vote. You are an enemy of our first Amendment right of Free Speech. Shame on you, and your quisling friends in the MSM that help pass the campaign finance reform.
17 posted on 03/10/2005 7:15:19 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
Is there any support at all for repealing, or at least fixing?

Besides FReepers making phone calls and sending emails, not to my knowledge.

18 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:34 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Sorry if we don't take them at their word. What's needed is to repeal Constitutionally Forcible Rape. 100% of it.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
19 posted on 03/10/2005 7:34:10 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin; KidGlock; Baynative; Flyer; Liz; doug from upland; PilloryHillary; Drango

20 posted on 03/10/2005 7:39:29 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson