Replies

Piltdown man was the hat rack until it was revealed. What will be revealed next. Nat Select isn't random and I didn't say it was. That is your assumption. But to not believe in Creation or ID for the origin of life leaves random does it not? If it isn't random then some intelligent force had to design and set it in motion.

I have said over and over that Nat Select is real. The changes are relatively minor though.

It appears to me that you are the flamer.

I'm the flamer? I'm not the one throwing around personal attacks (calling people jerks, dummazz's...).

What your saying is that since there was a hoax decades ago about one fossil, nothing can be trusted because anything a scientist ever says could be a hoax too.
And no, it is not my assumption that Natural selection is random, it was yours. You called evolution random,explicitly, and since natural selection is by far the most accepted mechanism that the theory of evolution postulates for speciation, you are indeed saying natural selection is random.
Which brings me to your other point; again, how many times must it be said that evolution is not a theory about the origins of life? You said , "But to not believe in Creation or ID for the origin of life leaves random does it not?" Evolution is a theory about the origin of SPECIES; it assumes existing species and explains how they adapt and change through time. You also say, "If it isn't random then some intelligent force had to design and set it(life)in motion" Maybe, maybe not. That is outside of theory and has no bearing on it's success or failure.
When you decide you want to actually read people's post before responding to them let us know.