The original scholarly article was posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1351820/posts
I can't see what your problem is with this piece-- above is given the link to the Kansas paper that published this piece as an editorial-- here's the link:
http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/editorial/11083843.htm
If this editorial writer is also a member of the same institute as the writer of the original scholarly article or something, well, what is remarkable or unethical about that?
The article is attributed to a newspaper, implying it is news. That's just deceptive. The author is a hack, promoting astrology out of one end and Christian fundamentalism out the other.