[DannyTN]

Thanks for the reply.

So it's nothing more than an educated guess. And the failure to account for a global flood and/or it's aftermath, or even a bad projection in sediment rates could cause 50,000 to be a bad date.

[Strategerist]

And the failure to account for a global flood

Don't need to account for one because there isn't a scrap of evidence that at any point there was a flood covering the entire world at the same time.

[tx_eggman]

So it's nothing more than an educated guess. And the failure to account for a global flood and/or it's aftermath, or even a bad projection in sediment rates could cause 50,000 to be a bad date.

Your obsession with 6 days, 6000 years ago probably cause you to be a bad date too.

[SlowBoat407]

So it's nothing more than an educated guess.And the failure to account for a global flood and/or it's aftermath, or even a bad projection in sediment rates could cause 50,000 to be a bad date.

Key word here being "educated". My faith does not interfere with my ability to observe the world and my desire to understand its nature.

By the way, I use a Mac. Why don't we start up the whole Mac versus PC thing while we're at it. Or we could settle in and talk about a really fascinating hole in the ground.