Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior


The scientific case against Craterism

1. Meteor craters have not been observed to happen, now or in the past.
2. Meteor craters have never been reproduced in the lab, and are thus not scientific.
3. Thomas Jefferson said: "Gentlemen, I would rather believe that two Yankee professors would lie than believe that stones fall from heaven."
4. The odds against a random rock falling from the sky, striking the earth, and making a crater are astronomical.
5. The second law of thermodynamics prohibits meteor craters.
6. Meteor craters are not mentioned in the bible, nor are "rocks from the sky."
7. Craterism is a product of materialism and a Godless, naturalistic worldview.
8. Belief that rocks can fall from the sky promotes hedonism and amoral, animalistic behavior.
9. Craterism makes no predictions and is untestable; it is therefore not scientific.
10. Craterists can produce micro-craters, but have no evidence of macro-cratering.
11. Aristotle didn't believe in Craterism. Nor did Galileo, Newton, or Einstein.
12. Einstein even said: "God does not play dice!" Are you smarter than Einstein?
13. Scientists are abandoning craterism because they know it is not supported by evidence.
14. Anyone who thinks there are rocks in the sky has rocks in his head.
15. It takes more faith to believe in Craterism than it does to believe in the Tooth Fairy.
16. More and more scientists are turning to "Intelligent Crater" theory (IC). Craterism is a theory in crisis!

53 posted on 03/09/2005 11:04:11 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

LOL! Nice parody.


57 posted on 03/09/2005 11:05:48 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I wonder if you would be able to convince the folks that live on the moon of your silly 16 points.

I believ not.

71 posted on 03/09/2005 11:19:55 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

The Evolutionist case for Crater Evolution

  1. All crators evolved from earlier primitive crators.
  2. Some crators are more similar than other crators and are therefore closer on the crator tree than the other crators. The creator tree PROVES crator evolution is true.
  3. Creationists are liars.
  4. Any competing theory of how the crator got there is not science.
  5. Crator Design theorists are Creationists in hiding and are liars.
  6. All scientists believe in the evolution of crators.
  7. People who don't believe in crator evolution are not real scientists and do not publish in peer reviewed journals.
  8. Science can only consider natural causes for crator design.
  9. Giants rocks falling out of the sky are supernatural and therefore aren't science.
  10. Creationists bear false witness.
  11. That debree collects at the bottom crators as predicted by crator evolution PROVES that crator evolution is true.
  12. The CRASS - Crator Rectal Association of Sarcastic Scientists has issued a statement that Crator Design is not science.
  13. Creationists are liars.
  14. That big crators with big rims evolved from small crators with small rims is a fulfillment of crator evolution theory and PROVES crator evolution is true.
  15. Crator evolution is a fact. Crator evolution is a theory and in science a theory is stronger than facts.
  16. All reputable scientists believe in crator evolution.
  17. Everything fits as predicted.
  18. Creationists are liars.

73 posted on 03/09/2005 11:21:29 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson